Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEAR IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals restoring them to CESTAT for merits adjudication, holding that DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.
M/S MICROSOFT CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals challenging CESTAT orders, holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, and restored the appeals for merits adjudication following the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. Casio India Company Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals upholding that AMP expenses do not constitute an international transaction requiring transfer pricing adjustments under the 'Bright Line Test', following established precedent.
MS Chetak Motors Pvt Ltd and Ors v. Additional Commissioner (Anti-Evasion) CGST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the invocation of Section 74 CGST Act for wilful suppression of GST liabilities, directing supply of relied upon documents and fair adjudication, while dismissing the writ petition at the threshold.
M/S Eros Resorts & Hotel Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of property tax classification and rates imposed on star-rated hotels by the MCD under the DMC Act, affirming the reasonableness of the MVC's recommendations and rejecting challenges to the use of star ratings and inclusion of basements in tax calculations.
Aadil & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Anil Shekhawat v. Director General Border Security Force
The Delhi High Court directed the Director General of BSF to decide the petitioner's post confirmation petition within six weeks, emphasizing the obligation of administrative authorities to decide duly received petitions within a reasonable time.
Union of India & Ors. v. Capt. (In) Roy Joseph (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Po Log Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's discretionary refusal to grant leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Satish Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks by a reasoned order, reserving the petitioner's right to challenge the decision thereafter.
Zeeshan Vasim Hashmi v. Apeirogon Technologies Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the commercial appeal with liberty to pursue other legal remedies and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
SP Sharma v. State Bank of India and Others
Disciplinary proceedings initiated before retirement can be continued and concluded after superannuation, and dismissal imposed thereafter under service rules is valid and not barred by pension regulations.
Suraj Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CISF officer for producing a forged Scheduled Tribe certificate and unauthorized absence, affirming that only tribes notified under Article 342 are entitled to ST status and limiting judicial review in disciplinary matters.
Major Anish Muralidhar and Captain Carolin Johnson for Army v. COL Sanjam Mann
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Abdul Wajid @ Wajid v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324 and 341 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to serve the ends of justice.
Poonam v. Dharmender; Ravinder; Rajesh; Jai Bhagwan
The court held that succession to agricultural holdings under the DLR Act vests exclusively in male lineal descendants, barring female coparcenary rights, but civil courts retain jurisdiction over non-agricultural residential properties in Lal Dora areas, thus the suit is maintainable in part and defendants' applications for rejection are dismissed.
Shri Mool Chand Khairati Ram Hospital Ayurvedic Research Institutes v. Sardaram Bhati
The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidation of a domestic enquiry and dismissal of the employer's approval application due to denial of natural justice and failure to lead evidence, dismissing the appeal against these findings.
Suraj Mal Yadav v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on lease deed execution, ground rent, and stamp duty refund, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Rashiduddin Malik v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging alleged illegal construction for lack of locus standi and abuse of process, imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner for approaching the Court with unclean hands.
Darshana Sachdeva v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against sealing of the petitioner's premises due to violation of natural justice, pending disposal of the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD.