Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Neelkanth Realty Private Limited & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a preliminary limitation issue decided on demurrer in arbitration does not foreclose re-examination on evidence and that an arbitral award deciding limitation without evidence violates fundamental policy of Indian law, justifying judicial interference.
Assistant General Manager State Bank of India & Anr. v. Tanya Energy Enterprises
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory upfront payment under the OTS 2020 Scheme disentitles a borrower from having the application processed, setting aside the High Court's direction to consider such application.
The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, rejecting challenges that the amendments violated fundamental rights or legislative competence.
ba3cb2fc0f71cba9dc21fe765b6fa931cf5c2f2b0be883f98e74ba62ad3578d5
The Supreme Court held that a re-trial is an exceptional remedy not justified merely by procedural lapses in recording video evidence or non-examination of the Chemical Examiner, and restored the appeals for fresh consideration by the High Court.
Paramjeet Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC for lack of fraudulent intention and abuse of process, emphasizing that breach of contract alone does not constitute cheating.
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai v. Parle Products Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that freight charges reimbursed by purchasers under ex-factory contracts do not form part of the sale price and are not subject to sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Vaibhav Maruti Dombale v. The Assistant Registrar, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that the ITAT cannot recall its final order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act based on a subsequent Supreme Court ruling, limiting rectification powers to mistakes apparent from the record existing at the time of the original order.
Heena Mohammeddin Kashmiri v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court directed expeditious execution of a 2012 recovery certificate under the Consumer Protection Act, holding that unreasonable delay and pendency of delayed appeals cannot justify postponement of execution proceedings.
Feroz Khaja Mohammad Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld a preventive detention order under the MPDA Act, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and the detention was justified to maintain public order.
Zameer Ahmad & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Sony India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding the ITAT's order allowing depreciation on block of assets basis and rejecting additional AMP benchmarking adjustments in Sony India's transfer pricing dispute.
M/S RST Batteries & Anr. v. Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence Gurugram Zonal Unit & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST demand for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioners to pursue statutory appellate remedies under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
SHES AIR AND AUTOMATION v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, leaving issues of limitation and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
MRVS VALUE STRAIGHT PVT. LTD. v. BRIGHTSTAR RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving validity and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
Tanveer Zaki v. Anand Prakash Dube
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order granting retrospective MACP benefits to an employee redeployed from Lino Operator to Offset Machine Man, affirming consistent judicial precedents and principles of non-discrimination.
91 Springboard Business Hub Private Limited v. RCPL Logistics Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement and directed appointment of an arbitrator accordingly.
Axis Finance Limited v. Laxman Pralhad Chavan & Pushpa Laxman Chavan
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring substantive issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Axis Finance Limited v. Nitin Negi
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
M/S IG PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging amendments to the Customs Tariff Act as infructuous since the amendments had not come into force due to lack of government notification.
M/S KANTA FOOD PRODUCT v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act cannot continue beyond one year and set aside the attachment accordingly.