Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S MOHAN FOOTCARE PVT. LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST
The Delhi High Court directed the GST department to re-credit Input Tax Credit adjusted against erroneous refunds despite technical portal limitations, allowing the writ petition.
Findoc Ventures Private Limited v. GST Officer Ward 101 Zone 9 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against GST adjudication orders despite pending Supreme Court challenges to the validity of related notifications, emphasizing procedural compliance and leaving the question of validity open.
Manjeet Singh Jassal and Anr. v. Atma Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint seeking partition and related reliefs cannot be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely on maintainability objections under the Benami Act without evidence.
Union of India and Anr. v. Neeta Mishra
The High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order directing supply of ACRs without considering limitation, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of limitation before deciding merits.
Surender Kumar Garg v. The State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied in a criminal forgery and cheating case involving a forged Letter of Intent and large cash transactions, due to the gravity of offences and non-cooperation with investigation.
Prabhat Kathuria and Ors. v. Anju Babbar
The Delhi High Court set aside interim orders restoring possession without adjudication and staying a Will's operation, directing proper legal procedure under CPC and Specific Relief Act.
Union of India & Anr. v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against an employee for obtaining employment through a forged Scheduled Tribes certificate are valid despite the Madhuri Patil guidelines, setting aside the Tribunal's quashing of such inquiry.
Axis Finance Limited v. K Ravi Kishan Reddy
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
Ravinder @ Bihari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case where medical and CCTV evidence indicated natural death, emphasizing protection of personal liberty and the need for a flexible approach in prolonged trials.
Riya Gupta v. Nninjas Model Management Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, emphasizing arbitral autonomy and limited judicial interference.
Vinti Gupta v. Tarun Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court restored interim rental expenses for an employed wife under the PWDV Act, affirming maintenance for the minor child and clarifying that an earning wife is not entitled to personal maintenance but can claim rental support to live independently.
Dr Mahesh Y Reddy v. Kevin Marcus William Govinder Singh Olausson
The Delhi High Court held that the limited scope of inquiry under Section 11 mandates appointment of an arbitrator where an arbitration agreement exists, leaving allegations of fraud and limitation to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
K v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 25-year sentence of a mother for abetting the repeated sexual assault of her minor daughter, affirming that credible child testimony and explained delay suffice for conviction under the POCSO Act.
Jayantkumar Chandubhai Patel v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that revocation of OCI registration without prior notice and opportunity of hearing violates Section 7D of the Citizenship Act and set aside the impugned orders.
Bhanu Chaudhary v. Geeta Rani Alias Geeta Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of plaint for defective valuation where a non-executant plaintiff sought declaration and injunctions without paying court fees based on market value of the property.
Nitin Ahluwalia v. State of Punjab & Anr.
The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC as malicious and an abuse of process, emphasizing the need to consider foreign court orders and the absence of requisite cruelty ingredients.
State of Uttarakhand v. Anil & Ors.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic acquittal judgment for lack of reasoning and remanded the criminal appeals for fresh hearing with proper evaluation of evidence.
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Nilesh C. Ojha & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a sitting Judge who supplies information for suo motu contempt proceedings is not a complainant or necessary party, dismissed the advocate's prayer to implead her, and took prima facie cognizance of his scandalous allegations as criminal contempt.
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Nilesh C. Ojha & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the interim application and initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Nilesh C. Ojha, directing him to file a defence and posting the matter for further hearing.
Afreen Abubakar Tayal v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court ordered immediate release of a detenue held without judicial authorization after investigation found insufficient evidence, emphasizing the mandatory duty under Section 189 BNSS, 2023 to release accused when evidence is deficient.