Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Adison Resorts Limited v. Haveli Restaurant and Resorts Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by restraining the appellant from using the device mark pending suit and directed a final hearing of the interlocutory application without expressing any opinion on merits.
Paramount Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. RDSS Fab Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's rejection of a late witness list filed without condonation of delay, allowing only an opportunity to file a formal condonation application before the trial court.
M/S SUGBANDH PLATINUM PVT LTD v. M/S MAYA JEWELLERS
The High Court upheld the trial court’s closure of cross-examination after the petitioner declined to cross-examine despite a last and final opportunity, emphasizing the need to prevent undue delays in civil trials.
M/S UNILEC ENGINEERS LTD v. M/S HPL ELECTRIC AND POWER LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to recall and further cross-examine a witness under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC, holding that the provision does not empower parties to seek additional cross-examination and dismissing the petition as frivolous.
Hamid Raza v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a Muslim man charged with marrying a minor, recognizing the validity of marriage under Islamic law upon attainment of puberty, procedural irregularities in arrest, prosecutrix’s support, and trial delay, while highlighting the conflict between personal law and statutory provisions.
Smt. A v. The State (NCT Govt. of Delhi) & Mr. Rajan Khurana
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from criminal intimidation and insult to modesty charges due to lack of specific evidence and intent, dismissing the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Areen Abbas v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a serious kidnapping and robbery case due to his absconding status, prior criminal record, and ongoing investigation with unrecovered evidence.
Chand Miyan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an accused for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child, affirming that credible child testimony supported by DNA evidence suffices for conviction under the POCSO Act despite absence of visible injuries.
Md. Murshid v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for anal rape of a minor under POCSO and IPC, relying on the victim's identification and corroborative medical and DNA evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Ajeet Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed acceptance of offline applications without age restrictions as interim relief to maintain parity, leaving final eligibility to the Tribunal's decision.
Mohd Arif v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the MCD's closure notice against a bakery after accepting that a gas oven was used and directed compliance with health trade license conditions.
Jagmohini v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to provide the petitioner with relevant orders and stayed coercive action for three weeks to enable filing of an appeal before the ATMCD.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MWO Chandra Kishore Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its review to jurisdictional errors.
Shivam Agarwal & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh Amit Kumar @ Golu and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 380, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Satyawan Tanwar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on an amicable family settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Dr. K. Kannan v. The Registrar University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi’s exclusion of a candidate from Assistant Professor recruitment for failing to meet prescribed academic eligibility and screening criteria, emphasizing judicial deference to employer’s academic evaluation.
Pramod Kumar v. The State GNCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Daman Preet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380 and 411 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vineet Kumar Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.