Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Tahiliani Design Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals II, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte Order-in-Appeal due to procedural irregularity in hearing notices and allowed the petitioner a fresh hearing, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of GST notification extending adjudication deadlines.
Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax Delhi East & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a CGST order confirming tax demand and penalty for lack of reasoned consideration of foreign remittance proof, directing fresh adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing.
Treco Wire India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST order confirming demand and penalty for fraudulent ITC, holding that the limitation period for appeal had lapsed and principles of natural justice were complied with.
Smt Gopi Chhetri v. Union of India & Anr
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the relief sought had already been granted, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. Chatur Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of long-serving casual Monument Attendants, clarifying that continuous performance of essential duties for over ten years warrants regularization despite initial temporary status.
Shannu Baghel v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court struck down NHAI's recruitment criterion relying solely on CLAT (PG) scores for legal posts as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Prahalad & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that death during boarding/deboarding constitutes an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, entitling compensation to the dependents despite alleged contributory negligence.
Parveen Kumar Bansal & Anr. v. Ashwani Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court restrained the MCD from executing a demolition order until the appeal pending before the non-functional Appellate Tribunal MCD is heard.
Ajit Singh & Ors. v. Kanta Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that delay in filing suit cannot be condoned under Section 5 Limitation Act and time spent before Revenue Authorities cannot be excluded under Section 14(2) as the proceedings were not prosecuted in good faith or related to the same matter in issue.
SMT SUMEDHA CHOPRA v. SHRI SHITAL KUMAR BHANDARI & ANR.
The court held that it can rectify its inadvertent procedural error and restore a suit under its inherent powers despite the expiry of limitation for review or appeal, ensuring no party suffers due to the court’s mistake.
Rohtas Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary proceedings against an Additional SHO for negligence in controlling illicit liquor sale, ruling that reliance on preliminary enquiry material is permissible if procedural safeguards are met.
Prabhu Dayal v. CP & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police constable following a valid departmental enquiry for extortion, affirming limited judicial review and compliance with procedural requirements under Delhi Police Rules.
Amjad Khan v. The Chairman, Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of an OBC candidate whose certificate was issued after the cut-off date due to administrative delay, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.
Jitender Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Prince v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted for throwing boiling oil due to failure of prosecution to prove their identity and common intention beyond reasonable doubt.
Arshad Neyaz Khan v. State of Jharkhand & Another
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant for failure to establish fraudulent intention under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, emphasizing prevention of abuse of criminal law.
Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa v. Rajiv Nareshchandra Narula
The Supreme Court quashed disciplinary proceedings against an advocate for lack of prima facie satisfaction under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders before referral to disciplinary inquiry.
U.P. ASBESTOS LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS
The Supreme Court upheld a Rajasthan VAT exemption on asbestos cement products containing fly ash, ruling it constitutionally valid differentiation under Article 304(a) and not discriminatory against inter-State trade.
HLV Limited v. PBSAMP Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that compound interest cannot be claimed beyond the simple interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal under a contractually agreed interest regime, restoring the executing court's order rejecting such claim.
Rajnesh Sharma v. M/S. Business Park Town Planners Ltd.
The Supreme Court increased the interest rate on delayed possession refund from 9% to 18% per annum, emphasizing fairness and parity with the builder's interest charged on delayed payments.