Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sh. Naresh Chand Gupta & Anr. v. Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed transfer of pending winding up petitions against Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd. from the High Court to the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 for further adjudication.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sh Shubham Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a retest for a candidate affected by a technical glitch during a recruitment Skill/Typing Test, emphasizing fairness and discretion in procedural timelines.
Ramesh Chand Chopra v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448 and 380 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers to prevent abuse of process.
Sh. Suresh Kumar v. M/s NDPL and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as settled following an amicable resolution between the parties and permitted withdrawal of the petition.
Rohit v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 341, and 506 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sultan & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Kripa Nath Mishra & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld summons against key accused in a dowry harassment case while quashing proceedings against others due to vague allegations, emphasizing cautious exercise of quashing powers under Section 482 CrPC.
MS Sadiya Usmani and Anr. v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. to provide electricity connection to petitioners subject to formalities and disconnection upon MCD's action against unauthorized construction, balancing consumer rights and municipal regulations.
Mohd Nasir v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining demolition of the petitioner's property pending hearing of the appeal before the non-functional Appellate Tribunal MCD.
Mohit Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal
The Delhi High Court set aside the termination of a SSB constable’s services for alleged non-completion of probation, holding that termination orders must be based on valid recorded reasons and that the petitioner had satisfactorily completed probation.
Directorate of Enforcement v. M/S Vikas WSP Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension orders apply to the 180-day provisional attachment period under the PMLA, extending its validity beyond 180 days during the pandemic and allowing the Adjudicating Authority to confirm the attachment.
Upinder Kaur Malhotra v. Capt Teghjeet Singh Malhotra
The High Court held that divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act requires a joint petition evidencing clear mutual consent, and a Family Court cannot suo motu convert separate fault-based petitions into a mutual consent divorce decree.
Sarika Talwar v. Siddharth Talwar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Family Court's orders refusing to set aside ex-parte divorce proceedings and restore dismissed applications due to non-prosecution and unexplained delay.
Uzbekistan Airways v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / Avato Ward 202 Zone 11
The Delhi High Court permitted Uzbekistan Airways to file a time-barred appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act against a tax demand order, directing the appellate authority to decide on merits and consider the challenge to related notifications in line with a lead constitutional matter.
Naresh Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of contested GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Naresh Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to provide a personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Diva Saxena v. School of Planning and Architecture & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective enforcement of stricter attendance rules during an ongoing semester is arbitrary, allowing the petitioner to attend classes and appear in examinations with remedial accommodations.
Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Limited v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co. KG & Ors.
The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of it accordingly.
Jitender @ Kalla v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court permitted victim's family to intervene and seek recall of a furlough order granted to a life convict who misled the Court by suppressing material facts about his sentence conditions.
Jashvir Singh v. Union of India
The High Court directed the Medical Invalidation Board to provide the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before taking any decision, disposing of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits.