Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
P.P. International School v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking interim permission to deposit property tax under the MCD's Amnesty Scheme, holding that policy decisions on tax amnesty and related interim reliefs are not subject to judicial interference in view of a Supreme Court injunction.
Mohd. Sabir Ansari v. State (GNCTD) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Boang Technology Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 30, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of attached bank accounts upon deposit of twenty percent of the tax demand and permitted challenge before the Commissioner of Income Tax.
Krishna Devi v. MCD and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action to the petitioner challenging revocation of a sanctioned building plan, directing filing of reply and appeal despite absence of a Presiding Officer in the appellate tribunal.
Mohammad Hanif v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief by ordering temporary de-sealing of the petitioner's property and directed filing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, due to procedural irregularities and absence of a Presiding Officer.
Sushil Kumar Jain v. South DMC and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the compulsory retirement of a government servant, holding that later good service records and promotions must be considered before exercising such power under FR 56(j).
The Trustees of Princeton University v. The Vagdevi Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Princeton University, holding that its mark was used in India through reputation and publicity since 1911, entitling it to protection against the respondents' use of 'Princeton' in educational services.
Geeta Sharma v. State
The High Court held that petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging a final order accepting a cancellation report are maintainable despite availability of revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C., and issued notice for merits, emphasizing the inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process.
Gopal Dikshit v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi High Court dismissed revision petition challenging framing of charges against an IAS officer for alleged conspiracy and corruption in approval of manipulated cooperative society membership lists.
M/S ND INFO SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. v. REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief to restrain the respondent from conducting admissions, holding that while a prima facie contractual right existed, the balance of convenience and irreparable harm favored continuing the admission process for specially abled candidates.
Honasa Consumer Limited v. Cloud Wellness Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's interim injunction application in a copyright and passing off suit over skincare product trade dress, holding that disputed questions of originality, prior use, and distinctiveness require trial and that mere similarity in colour schemes without evidence of confusion does not warrant interim relief.
XERO DEGREES v. M/S FRANKART GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff to file additional WhatsApp communications at a preliminary stage under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC upon establishing reasonable cause for non-disclosure, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.
G4S LIMITED AND ANOTHER v. 4GROUP SAFEGUARD AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court granted and confirmed interim injunction restraining defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks 'G4S', holding that corporate name registration does not excuse trademark infringement.
Mandeep Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 451, 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
HOTELS.COM, LP v. BARATH M L AND ANR
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of HOTELS.COM, LP, restraining the defendants from using deceptively similar marks and awarded damages for trademark infringement and passing off.
Aethlon Medical, Inc v. Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks
Delhi High Court remanded a patent refusal under Section 3(i) for fresh consideration of amended claims, holding that belated objections cannot be entertained and amendments at appellate stage are permissible.
Helsinn Healthcare SA & Anr. v. Hetero Healthcare Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the period for filing replication in a suit where the defendant's written statement is belatedly filed and condoned starts from the date the written statement is taken on record, allowing the plaintiff's replication filed within that period.
Vinkal Prakash v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Neeraj Gupta v. The Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller's rejection of a patent application for an intravenous catheter device due to inadequate reasoning on inventive step and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Afzal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for robbery at knife point, holding that credible eyewitness testimony sufficed despite absence of CCTV footage and public witnesses.