Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Amit Kailas Varghade v. The State of Maharashtra; Vijay Ramsharan Thori
The Bombay High Court held that the statutory bar on entertaining appeals beyond 180 days under the SC & ST Act is unconstitutional and condoned delay in filing bail appeal, affirming the right to appeal and speedy trial.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rekha Lalchand Patel
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the insurance company's appeal by modifying the compensation awarded in a fatal motor accident claim, affirming insurer liability and applying the principle of notional income based on the deceased's occupation and prevailing wage standards.
Harbans Singh v. Anand Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, affirming landlord-tenant relationship and absence of suitable alternative accommodation.
Raghav Aditya Chits Pvt Ltd. v. Space Services (India) Pvt Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act filed by a company dissolved prior to filing, holding that a struck-off company lacks legal capacity to sue.
Syndicate Innovations International Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade
The Delhi High Court directed the Policy Relaxation Committee to reconsider the petitioner's import license revalidation applications in light of successful litigation and financial hardship, emphasizing the need for reasoned and non-arbitrary administrative decisions.
Castrol Limited v. Malang Haji Shaikh and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Castrol Limited against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement, pronouncing judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to file written statements.
Kanwaljit Singh LR v. Kulwant Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and non-availability of alternative accommodation despite tenant's challenges.
Union of India v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award declaring contractual restrictions on free transferability of shares in a public company void under Section 111A(2) of the Companies Act, dismissing the challenge by the Government.
Rakesh Kumar v. Ajay Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement presumed genuine and tenant's unsubstantiated claims insufficient to grant leave to defend.
Krishna Agencies v. Dr. Sabi Sabharwal
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order allowing substituted service by publication and affixation under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming that failure to file leave to defend leads to deemed admissions and eviction.
JAGDAMBEY BUILDERS PVT LTD v. JATINDER SINGH VOHRA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, holding that the fixed date for performance expired and the Plaintiff had notice of refusal well before filing the suit.
Arun Kumaran B v. Urmila Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside recovery rights against the owner and driver where the driver held a valid driving license and was not a minor at the time of the accident.
Sumit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that while there is no absolute right to spousal transfer, railway authorities must genuinely consider such requests subject to administrative feasibility, directing expeditious reconsideration of the petitioners' transfer applications.
Mahender Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge thereafter.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Man Industries (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by a party with interest, rendering the arbitrator de jure ineligible and the award void under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and Article 14 of the Constitution.
Air Force Naval Housing Board v. Umaxe Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of arbitral awards due to invalid unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without valid express waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, affirming the principle of equal treatment and impartiality in arbitration.
SAKSHI ELECRICALS POLYMERS ENGG CORPN v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST limitation extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision, upheld demand order after reply, and quashed a time-barred Show Cause Notice.
Shasmith Technologies Private Limited v. Max Healthcare Institute Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the commercial appeal following an amicable settlement, disposing of the matter without adjudication.
Sunbeam Real Ventures Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 86 Zone 9
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST tax demand orders passed without personal hearing, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit, while deferring the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered partnership firm can enforce statutory rights through a partner via writ petition and set aside an ex-parte tax demand order for lack of opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of impugned GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.