Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/s Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that a medical sales representative is not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing the writ petition challenging this classification.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. M/s Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order deleting additions treating certain receipts as fees for technical services or royalty, reaffirming the principle of consistency in coordinate bench decisions under the Income Tax Act and India-USA DTAA.
Vaibhav Malik v. Delhi Development Authority and Others
The Delhi High Court held that the Departmental Promotion Committee and Limited Departmental Competitive Examination are independent recruitment modes and vacated the Tribunal's interim order restraining the LDCE, affirming the petitioner's locus standi to challenge the order.
Poonam Bhargava v. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed fresh consideration of the petitioner’s representation for grant of veterinary license, applying its earlier batch order and mandating compliance with relevant policies and rules.
Deepti v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed installation of an electricity connection without deciding property ownership, clarifying that such connection does not confer ownership rights.
Dinesh Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition pending the filing and hearing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi due to the absence of a Presiding Officer.
Resident Welfare Association v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed municipal authorities to jointly inspect alleged illegal encroachments on public land and take lawful action to remove them, ensuring due process and notice to occupiers.
Shri Balbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and held that ownership claims require proper legal proceedings, emphasizing prevention of abuse of court process.
Ravi Singhania v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court restrained the MCD from executing a Sealing Order pending appeal before a non-functional Appellate Tribunal, granting interim protection to the petitioner.
Mirza Islam Baig v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against a demolition order and directed the petitioner to file an appeal within one week before the Appellate Tribunal MCD, restraining coercive action pending the appeal due to the absence of a Presiding Officer.
Sh. Jalauddin @ Pappu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a child under POCSO and IPC, emphasizing the credibility of the child victim's testimony corroborated by medical evidence and dismissing the appeal.
Mr. Alam Bir Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act provisions based on reliable injured eyewitness testimony despite inconclusive forensic evidence and challenged weapon recovery.
Sanjay Muniyan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a minor under IPC and POCSO, relying on the credible testimony of the child victim and modified the sentence to the period already served.
Hussain Ahmad & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC, reducing their sentences to the period already served while maintaining the fine.
Aadil @ Nauserwa v. State
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by substituting the appellant's conviction under Section 6 POCSO with Section 10 POCSO based on forensic evidence and consistent victim testimony, while setting aside convictions under Section 377 IPC due to lack of medical injury evidence.
Karanja Terminal and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no binding contract arose without approval of all consortium lenders under the OTS bid process, validating the lenders' annulment of the settlement and fresh bidding.
Jeetu Ranjeet v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 POCSO to 'bad touch' under Section 10 POCSO, reducing the sentence accordingly, based on inconsistencies and medical evidence.
Baniya@Raju v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child victim with mild intellectual disability, holding that credible child testimony alone suffices for conviction under POCSO despite absence of medical corroboration.
Rajendra Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a shopkeeper for sexual assault on a 7-year-old child under the POCSO Act based on credible sole testimony and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh expert medical examination to resolve a substantial discrepancy in disability assessment reports, emphasizing that the new Medical Board's report shall be final and binding.