Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Container Corporation of India Ltd v. Ulink Agritech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from a Concession Agreement, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Renu Arora and Others v. St. Margaret Senior Secondary School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment delegating judicial functions to Committees for deciding teachers' pay claims under the 6th and 7th CPC in private unaided schools, holding such adjudication must be judicially decided and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.
M/S LORD BIHARI FURNITURES PVT LTD v. KANCHAN BALA THUKRAL
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and objections on arbitrability are not maintainable.
Rajendra Mittal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Keshoram Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes, leaving validity and arbitrability issues to the tribunal.
M/S Kothari and Associates and Ors. v. Gargi College
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a contractual dispute between an architectural firm and Gargi College as per the arbitration agreement.
M/S SGS INDIA PVT. LTD v. BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from a contract termination and payment issues between M/s SGS India Pvt. Ltd. and the Bureau of Indian Standards.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. SUNIL CHHABRA & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence, and held that prior unilateral arbitrator appointments and awards are invalid.
M/S NBCC (INDIA) LTD. v. M/S RIC PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed commercial appeal for lack of sufficient cause to condone the 117-day delay, emphasizing strict interpretation of limitation provisions in commercial matters.
M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. M/S Patel Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring validity and arbitrability issues to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. Palak Metals
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving validity and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
CLIX Capital Services Pvt Ltd v. M/S Atrium Newgen Diagnostics
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving objections on arbitrability and validity to the arbitral tribunal.
Baani Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Gigantic Huge Restaurants LLP
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement in a Lease Deed dispute, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny at this stage.
G.N.G. Auto Aids Pvt Ltd v. Just Funky India Trading Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under a lease deed arbitration clause designating New Delhi/Gurgaon as the seat of arbitration, overruling the respondent's jurisdictional objection.
SH BALBIR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed re-fixation of petitioners' pension based on revised pay and ordered payment release within six weeks, allowing revival of petitions if grievances persist.
Mahesh Shrivastva @ Jeeva v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed a mechanically passed externment order against the petitioner for lack of cogent evidence and procedural fairness, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review and protection of fundamental rights.
Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order treating the period between dismissal and acquittal as service for notional benefits upon acquittal after full trial, rejecting the petitioners’ claim of discretion to treat it as dies non.
Ashwin Murli v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that vacancies reserved for Persons with Benchmark Disability are carried forward for up to two recruitment years before lapsing, and filling such vacancies with non-PwBD candidates in subsequent years does not reduce overall reservation rights.
State v. Amit Gautam
The Delhi High Court upheld a five-year sentence under Section 304 Part II IPC for non-premeditated matricide, emphasizing proportionality and balancing mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/s Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order deleting disallowance under Section 14A for AY 2018-19, holding the 2022 amendment to Section 14A is prospective and does not apply retrospectively.
ICMR - National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research v. Rajani Yadav & Ors.
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order revising respondents' salary without hearing the petitioner and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity to respond.