Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S IMS Mercantiles Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that GST demand and pre-deposit must be calculated on turnover related to disputed goods, relegating the petitioner to appellate remedy against the impugned tax order.
FOSUN PHARMA INDUSTRIAL PTE. LTD v. ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2019-20 and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration upon submission of supporting documents by the petitioner.
Delhi Development Authority v. Ziaul Haque & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of JJ cluster residents to rehabilitation under the 2004 DDA policy despite allegations of commercial use, emphasizing verified residential status and insufficient evidence of hazardous activities.
Shikhar Prasad v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that a person with only one testis due to prior orchidectomy is disqualified under CAPF medical guidelines and that the precedent for cured ailments does not apply to permanent conditions.
Nirmala Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a CRPF Sub-Inspector is entitled to Extraordinary Pension as the death was attributable to service-related ailments despite pre-existing alcoholic liver disease.
Government of J and K & Anr. v. Dr. Rajinder Kumar Trisal
The Delhi High Court upheld retrospective time bound promotions and monetary benefits for migrant doctors of Jammu & Kashmir, emphasizing the State's duty to extend court-granted reliefs to all similarly placed employees without discrimination.
Anand, Advs v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's application for preservation of call detail records and location charts at the pre-charge stage under Section 94 BNSS, distinguishing preservation from production and emphasizing the necessity to prevent loss of critical evidence.
Elxir Trading Pvt. Ltd v. Kent RO Systems Ltd
The Delhi High Court corrected a clerical error in its order to accurately record counsel's appearance for the appellant in a commercial appeal.
Union of India and Ors v. Ex Sgt Nitesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service connection.
Union of India & Ors. v. MWO Kishore Kumar (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by positive evidence.
Ambedkhar Ganguly Student House for Women University of Delhi & Anr. v. Anilyadav
The Delhi High Court approved a Settlement Agreement resolving a labour dispute and directed payment and release of amounts deposited in Court, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Rakesh Sharma v. Vikram Saraswat
The High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC challenging an interim order in execution proceedings, holding that such orders are not maintainable unless they finally dispose of the lis.
The Chairman Central Board of Secondary Education v. Shri S P Rana
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing release of gratuity amounts between parties by mutual consent without prejudice to their rights in ongoing departmental inquiry proceedings.
Sumit Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition setting aside cancellation of army candidature where the alleged fabricated domicile certificate issue was not conclusively established and a genuine certificate was produced.
Zahid Khan & Anr. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 308 IPC but modified sentences to probation, emphasizing judicial discretion and reformative justice under the Probation of Offenders Act.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Shyam Dulari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's delayed petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal of respondents due to insufficient prima facie case and material discrepancies in prosecution evidence.
M/S Rajesh Metals v. Office of the Commissioner CGST Delhi North
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction is generally not maintainable in fraudulent ITC cases where an alternate statutory remedy exists, but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit due to possible non-consideration of its reply.
Future Consumer Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a GST order accompanied by DRC-07 is valid despite lacking signature, but rectification orders adversely affecting a party require a personal hearing under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017.
M/S Aviraj Udyog v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related notifications.
Enviro Tech Ventures Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court directed petitioner to file appeal against GST adjudication order, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court's decision.