Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nishant Karsan Bhagat v. The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.
The Court upheld CIDCO's authority to allot lands prior to publication of the NMMC's Draft Development Plan and dismissed petitions challenging such allotments and State Government directives protecting them.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Dr. T.R Srinivasan
The Delhi High Court held that administrative staff of IGNOU are not "teachers" under the Act and Statutes and thus not entitled to superannuation at 65 years or Career Advancement Scheme benefits, setting aside the Single Judge's contrary decision based on an invalid Ordinance.
Vitthalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court remanded the issue of EMI deduction for determining sugarcane revenue sharing price for 2016-2017 to the statutory Board for fresh consideration in light of subsequent policy developments.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. R.D. Sharma
The Supreme Court held that a pensioner retiring before post upgradation under amended service rules is not entitled to retrospective pension benefits of the upgraded post, rejecting the application of 'equal pay for equal work' in such cases.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. R.D. Sharma
The Supreme Court held that a pensioner retired before post upgradation under the 2008 Rules is not entitled to the upgraded apex scale pension, rejecting the application of 'equal pay for equal work' retrospectively.
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD v. MEENU DADEIA@MEENU VARDHAN
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision that a contractual employee of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi qualifies as a departmental candidate entitled to age relaxation for recruitment purposes.
Wadhwa Group Housing Private Ltd. v. Mr. Vijay Choksi & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that all promoters registered under a real estate project are jointly liable to refund amounts with interest under RERA, regardless of which promoter received payment, dismissing the appeal of a promoter denying liability.
Tushar Chawla v. Mr Tarun Sikka
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to respond to a valid notice of arbitration under two agreements.
15008c15874823cca4586a2f72feac286df03b7364dd95ea3bafdfb7642e7afc
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition notifications and compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, affirming procedural compliance and adequacy of compensation.
The Deputy Director and Ors. v. Vijaya Balbhim Mali and Ors.
The Bombay High Court set aside the Industrial Court's order granting permanency to daily wage social forestry workers, holding that mere long service without proper appointment does not confer permanency under constitutional and statutory law.
Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking v. Kishor Gulab Salve
The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's order reinstating a disabled employee dismissed for unauthorized absence, holding that dismissal was victimization violating disability protection laws and directing partial backwages and continuity of service.
Govind Krishna Dixit v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of delayed enforcement of a disciplinary penalty and recovery of excess salary from a government servant, dismissing the challenge to the penalty implementation order.
Estella Fernandes v. Swarna Highrise Constructions
Minority tenants cannot stall redevelopment by refusing agreements or claiming ownership rights beyond tenancy entitlements under DCPR 2034; redevelopment may proceed with majority consent and statutory compliance.
State of Maharashtra v. Rajagonda Bhimgonda Patil
The Bombay High Court dismissed the State's Review Petition and application for condonation of a 4-year delay, holding that subsequent overruling of precedent is not a ground for review and that inordinate delay without sufficient cause cannot be condoned even for the State.
Mumbai Fire Services Union v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that the Fire Brigade Department of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai is part of the same industrial establishment under labour law, restoring the Labour Court's finding and remitting the unfair labour practice complaint for final adjudication.
M/s. Ashwini General Hospital & Intensive Care Centre v. Veronica Johnson Pereira
The Bombay High Court upheld the illegality of the respondent’s termination but modified reinstatement with backwages to a Rs. 10 lakh compensation award, rejecting the petitioner’s false resignation defence.
CLSA India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
The Bombay High Court held that reassessment notices and orders issued in the name of a non-existent company post-amalgamation are invalid and set aside the impugned proceedings.
Siemens Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-8(2)(1), Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that a reopening notice under Section 148 issued to a company that ceased to exist due to amalgamation is invalid and quashed the notice and related order.
Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd. v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued in the name of a non-existent amalgamated company is void and set aside the reassessment notice accordingly.
M/s. Shree Durga Trading Co. v. Ateeq Anwar Agboatwala and Anr.
The Court held that unauthorized subletting constitutes a continuing wrong resetting limitation, upheld eviction decrees on bonafide requirement and comparative hardship, and dismissed the tenant's revision application.