Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Venus Vasant Valley Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Sheth Developers Private Limited
The Bombay High Court allowed the developer to continue construction using disclosed FSI and TDR without flat purchasers' consent under Section 7A of MOFA, holding that full disclosure of development potential satisfies statutory requirements and phased development conditions conveyance rights.
Karam Bir v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging AICTE's remedial examination modalities, holding that adequate public notice was given, registration deadlines must be respected, and no legal basis existed to relax pass criteria or round off marks.
PVR INOX LTD. v. SHEETAL ANSAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court referred disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 and 3 to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the inclusion of respondent 2 to the arbitrator's determination.
Smt. Saranga Anil Kumar Aggarwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking enhanced development rights under new regulations without scheme conversion, holding that statutory conditions and prevailing regulations govern entitlement.
Neeraj Kumar Uttam v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF to decide the petitioner's application for withdrawal of resignation under Rule 26(4) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, emphasizing that tentative file notings do not constitute binding acceptance.
Anupam Dikshit v. S. Kumars Nationwide Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that suits instituted prior to liquidation can continue in Civil Court with the Official Liquidator impleaded as party, as Section 33(5) of the IBC bars only fresh suits after liquidation and does not oust Civil Court jurisdiction over pending suits.
M/S AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S PANDIT AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes under a Supply Agreement to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the respondent's consent.
Bhartiya Kala Prasarini Sabha v. Rajendra Pandharinath Dhavale
The High Court upheld the illegality of a promotion violating reservation roster rules but modified the relief to restrict retrospective promotion and backwages, directing reconsideration by the promotion committee.
2d77262a3a33c735c260eebc4345b6764de9c7b601db8aac102956ae76177735
The court upheld the validity of summons issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the appellants' challenge based on procedural defects and affirming the trial court's jurisdiction.
GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. v. SURENDRA SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on delayed retiral benefits and interest on that interest, ruling that the Interest Act's prohibition on interest on interest does not apply to such administrative tribunal orders.
Anil Govind Ganu v. Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that founder directors with ultimate control over the company are not employees entitled to gratuity beyond statutory limits absent an express agreement, and balance sheet entries alone do not create such liability.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act due to failure to nominate an arbitrator, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt Ltd v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the respondent failed to nominate one, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
Dangkwang Precision India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dangkwang Precision Employees Union
The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's wage revision Award, affirming the need for substantiated financial assessment including legitimate depreciation and proper industry comparison in wage disputes.
Shri Onkar Dattatray Kalmankar v. Public Information Officer
The Bombay High Court held that marks obtained by candidates in a public recruitment process are not exempt from disclosure under RTI and ordered disclosure of all candidates' marks to promote transparency and public confidence.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Subhash Mahadev Desai
The Bombay High Court set aside the Labour Court's award reinstating a dismissed employee due to a 13-year delay in raising the industrial dispute, holding that unreasonable delay and laches are fatal to such claims under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Sharekhan Limited v. Monita Kisan Khade & Ors.
Bombay High Court held that failure to maintain SEBI-mandated pre-trade confirmations does not automatically entitle clients to recover losses from stockbrokers, setting aside arbitral awards that awarded damages without proof of actual loss.
The Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operative Bank v. Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a civil suit challenging SARFAESI Act auction proceedings is barred under Section 34 unless fraud is specifically pleaded, restoring the Trial Court's order rejecting the plaint.
BOSCH LIMITED v. BOSCH EMPLOYEES UNION
The Bombay High Court modified a Labour Court award reinstating dismissed workers by directing lump sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to proved misconduct balanced against victimisation and long delay.
Shyamalendu Kumar Das v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld interception orders under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act in a corruption case, holding that succinct reasons recording public safety and necessity suffice and that such orders are judicially reviewable but entitled to deference.