Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Karshanbhai ShamlaJi Mali v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking withdrawal of resignation filed after more than a year, holding that such withdrawal is impermissible beyond the 90-day period prescribed under CCS CCA Pension Rules.
Public Works Department v. Chander Kala
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against the gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Pramod Singla v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a COFEPOSA detention order, ruling that delay by the Central Government in deciding a post-referral representation is not fatal when awaiting the Advisory Board's opinion.
Vinod Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions and life sentences of three appellants for gang rape, emphasizing that appeals must be decided on merits and remission of sentence lies solely with the Government.
Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
The court dismissed the Revenue's application for clarification, affirming that its earlier judgment on charitable trusts under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act applies to the cases before it and does not bar future reassessments or eligibility checks by the Revenue.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
The Supreme Court clarified that its judgment on tax exemption for charitable trusts is final for decided assessment years and that the Revenue must apply the law declared on a case-by-case basis for future years, dismissing the Revenue's application for broader reassessment powers.
Income Tax Commissioner v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
The Supreme Court clarified that its judgment on charitable trust exemptions under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act applies only to the assessment years under appeal, allowing the Revenue to reassess future years based on the declared legal principles.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
The Supreme Court clarified that its prior judgment on charitable trusts under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act is final for decided assessment years, allowing the revenue to apply the law to future years without re-examining past assessments.
Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition challenging the death sentence of Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq, holding that call data records without mandatory Section 65B certification are inadmissible but affirming conviction based on other incriminating circumstantial evidence.
Sarada Vidhyalaya Matriculation Higher Secondary School v. The Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department & Ors.
The Supreme Court granted time to cure defects in multiple special leave petitions, allowed withdrawals and settlements, condoned delay in refiling, and dismissed matters lacking instructions or pursuant to precedent.
SARADA VIDHYALAYA MATRICULATION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL v. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT & ORS.
The Supreme Court disposed of multiple civil petitions on procedural grounds including withdrawal, settlement, curing of defects, and lack of instructions, without addressing substantive issues.
Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Kansagra
The Supreme Court convicted Perry Kansagra for civil and criminal contempt for willfully disobeying custody orders, breaching undertakings, misleading the Court, and obstructing justice in a transnational child custody dispute.
Maringmei Acham v. M Maringmei Khuripou
The Supreme Court held that substitution of legal representatives in an interlocutory appeal enures for the entire suit, preventing abatement despite non-substitution in the original suit, and allowed the appeal to proceed.
Maringmei Acham v. M Maringmei Khuripou
The Supreme Court held that bringing legal representatives on record in an interlocutory appeal prevents abatement of the suit after the death of the sole plaintiff, allowing continuation of the suit and appeal.
Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. v. Mathias Oram
The Supreme Court upheld a uniform cut-off date for compensation under the CBA Act, clarified limited applicability of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, and directed strict compliance with compensation and rehabilitation for tribal landowners displaced by coal mining acquisitions.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Karan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to failure of the prosecution to prove identity and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Navendu Agrawal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the refusal to order police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi and no cognizable offence was made out without formal complaints from authorities.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Moet Hennessy India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenditure, ruling that such expenditure does not constitute an international transaction absent concrete evidence, and rejected the Revenue’s reliance on the Bright Line Test.
Nusrat Jahan v. Professor Nazim Hussain Jafri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a candidate who had not completed the qualifying degree before the application date was ineligible for Ph.D. admission and that admission to two regular courses concurrently is prohibited under university rules.
Rajesh Sharma v. Union of India
Employees under the ACP Scheme must pass the trade test in the first attempt after 09.08.1999 to claim benefits from the due date of service completion; otherwise, benefits accrue only from the date of passing the test.