Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -12 v. Karuna Garg
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of unexplained credit additions under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE, holding that suspicion alone without cogent evidence cannot sustain tax additions on alleged bogus LTCG transactions.
Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta v. Mumbai Building Repair And Reconstruction Board
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a condition in redevelopment NOCs requiring reimbursement of expenses by developers, rejecting claims of double taxation and lack of statutory authority under the MHADA Act.
Awadesh Singh Yadav & Ors v Labour Enforcement Officer Dadra & Nagar Haveli & Ors
The High Court held that denial of proper representation vitiated the domestic enquiry, quashed the approval of dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, resulting in automatic reinstatement of workmen with back wages.
The Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) v. Mahavir Logistics
The Bombay High Court upheld the CESTAT's order setting aside the revocation of a Customs Broker's license on grounds of proportionality while affirming penalty and forfeiture, emphasizing judicial review of punishment under Customs Broker Licensing Regulations.
M/s. Meenakshi Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Abhyudaya Green Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that issues of novation and existence of arbitration agreement at the Section 11(6) stage must generally be left to the Arbitral Tribunal, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of the arbitration appointment application.
The TATA Power Company Limited Transmission v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld MERC's discretion to grant a transmission licence for the HVDC Kudus-Aarey project under Section 62 without mandatory competitive bidding, ruling the project as existing and not subject to TBCB under the Government of Maharashtra's 2019 resolution.
The TATA Power Company Limited Transmission v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
The Supreme Court upheld MERC's grant of a transmission licence for the Kudus-Aarey HVDC project under Section 62 without competitive bidding, affirming regulatory discretion and the co-equal status of Sections 62 and 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Union of India v. Subrata Nath
The Supreme Court held that courts must not reappreciate evidence or substitute findings in departmental disciplinary proceedings and upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable for negligence and prior misconduct, setting aside the High Court's order of reinstatement and fresh punishment.
Union of India v. Subrata Nath
The Supreme Court held that courts must not reappreciate evidence or interfere with disciplinary penalties unless findings are perverse or inquiry flawed, restoring dismissal of a CISF constable for negligence and dereliction of duty.
Garima Khera v. Anmol Khera
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a Domestic Violence complaint to the Family Court where a related maintenance petition is pending to ensure consistent adjudication and avoid contradictory decisions.
Nilofar Singh v. Pramod Dang & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's applications to implead Mr. O.P. Manchanda and M/s ASG Securities Pvt. Limited as necessary parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC, holding that limitation and disputed factual issues cannot be decided at the impleadment stage.
Ram Sharma v. Ashok Kumar Sharma; Shyam Sharma; Anuradha Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to set aside a compromise decree on grounds of fraud, holding that such decrees are binding unless valid compromise is disproved and ownership of immovable property requires registered sale deeds.
Rajat Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Police Traffic
The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC is a decree and only appeal under Section 96 CPC is maintainable, dismissing the revision petition under Section 115 CPC.
Chimes Aviation Private Limited v. United India Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an arbitrator as the arbitration clause in the insurance policy designates London as the seat and English law as governing law.
Amandeep Singh v. Pradeep Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a suit decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that failure to deposit conditional security justified granting judgment to the plaintiff where the defendant's defence was plausible but improbable.
Raj Kumar v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under the 1961 Scheme, only persons whose entire land has been acquired are eligible for alternative plot allotment, dismissing the petition of a partially affected landowner.
Dhanwanti @ Dhanpati & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR for theft of a mobile phone, holding that return of the stolen phone and complainant's willingness to proceed do not justify quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
ABB Limited v. Commissioner VAT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that input tax credit under the DVAT Act, 2004 can only be claimed for the tax period in which the turnover or purchase arises, as determined by the consideration received or receivable, and not based solely on the date of tax invoices or subsequent reimbursement arrangements.
HANS STUDY CENTER v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing independent verification of the appellant's expenditure claims before rejecting reimbursement of grant-in-aid under the Scheme of Coaching for Scheduled Tribes.
Mukesh Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that for determining tax dues under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, the reduced and accepted demand in the adjudicating authority's order-in-original prevails over the original SCN amount, even if the order is set aside and remanded.