Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Narsingh Shah v. BDR Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed an order striking off the tenant's defence for non-payment of rent, holding that mandatory procedural safeguards under Order XV-A CPC were not complied with.
Rajeev C. Mathur and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation in promotions to Group 'A' and 'B' posts under the PwD Act, overruling government OMs and earlier tribunal decisions to the contrary.
Air Customs v. State
The Delhi High Court held that a trial court cannot dismiss proceedings against an absconding accused merely because non-bailable warrants remain unexecuted and must instead follow the procedure under Section 82 Cr.P.C. to declare the accused a proclaimed offender.
Bijender Singh v. M/s Religare Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act to entertain suits challenging receiver appointment orders absent clear fraud, and unregistered documents do not confer title to immovable property.
SI Daya Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that failure to offer a pay fixation option at promotion constitutes discrimination, directing retrospective re-fixation of pay and payment of arrears to the petitioner.
Parminder Khetarpal v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but dismissed the petition challenging the grant of probation to the accused, affirming the liberal approach towards probation for first-time offenders with good conduct.
Kumar Infratrade Enterprises Private Limited v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld IRCTC's disqualification of a bidder for non-compliance with essential tender eligibility criteria, emphasizing strict adherence to tender terms and limited judicial interference in administrative tender decisions.
Vishal Arora v. Yes Bank Limited; Hemant Dhingra v. Yes Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaint and summons against former authorized signatories of a company in a cheque dishonour case, holding that their resignation prior to dishonour is a disputed fact requiring trial.
H.T. Media Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the disallowance of administrative expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) against H.T. Media Ltd., holding that the Assessing Officer properly recorded satisfaction before rejecting the Assessee's own disallowance and including subsidiary investments in the computation.
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. Badarpur Power Engineers & Workers Union
The Delhi High Court held that settlements arrived at during conciliation proceedings are binding on all employees and set aside a Labour Court award granting blanket compassionate appointments ignoring binding settlements, remanding the matter for reconsideration.
Ajay Passi v. Priyanka Passi
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed the petitioner to file affidavit evidence and be cross-examined, directing expeditious disposal of the family dispute matter.
Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpa Wanti & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputed factual claims under a State largesse scheme cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction and must be adjudicated by a civil court, setting aside the Single Judge's order granting Category A benefits under the Gadgil Assurance Scheme.
Ram Chander v. M/S Rama Industries
The Delhi High Court held that once a claim petition is barred under the ESI Act, the Employees’ Compensation Commissioner should not decide on merits, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.
Rajeev Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent board to determine the petitioner's fitness for service and mandated reinstatement if found fit, quashing the termination orders pending such examination.
Surjeet Singh Virdi v. Jasvinder Singh Bitto Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to reconsider the refusal to take the written statement on record due to alleged incomplete service of summons, allowing the petitioner to file a review petition and deferring further proceedings.
Raju @ Kristo v. State
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence based on medical age determination, set aside the sentence while maintaining conviction under Sections 302 and 452 IPC, and granted the benefit of juvenility retrospectively.
Mohammad Shahid v. DTTE, Govt. of NCTD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the reserve list for recruitment is valid only for two years from the final result notification, and no recommendation can be made thereafter, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for appointment beyond this period.
Deere and Company & Anr. v. Jitender Kumar Gaur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Deere & Company against defendants selling counterfeit engine oil products bearing its well-known 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD' trademarks, issuing permanent injunctions and awarding costs.
BOLT TECHNOLOGY OU v. UJOY TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the defendants to modify their 'BOLT' mark to 'BOLT.EARTH' pending final hearing in a trademark infringement and passing off suit filed by Bolt Technology OU.
M/S AWADH CONSTRUCTION v. M/S AMAARPREET SHUTTERING
The Delhi High Court allowed recall of the complainant for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C due to insufficient time to prepare, emphasizing the court's discretion to ensure a just decision.