Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S SUN AVIATION PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)
The Delhi High Court set aside a Customs penalty order for lack of valid service of Show Cause Notice, emphasizing that service by speed post must be with acknowledgment due to satisfy natural justice.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against disallowance under Section 14A where no exempt income was earned, condoned delay due to COVID-19, and held that the Finance Act 2022 amendment is not retrospective.
M/S KBG ENGINEERS v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court directed constitution of the Dispute Redressal Committee with a 90-day timeline and eventual appointment of an arbitrator, leaving limitation and other defenses to be decided by the arbitrator, emphasizing the principle of 'when in doubt, do refer' under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.
Aktiebolaget Volvo v. Volvo White Paints Industries
Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Volvo plaintiffs restraining defendants from using the 'VOLVO' mark, awarding injunction, damages, and costs for trademark infringement and passing off.
My Preferred Transformation and Hospitality Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. Faridabad Implements Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the condonable period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act is not a period of limitation and cannot be extended by court vacations or Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, dismissing the petition filed after the condonable period expired.
Ishwar Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR based on a genuine, voluntary settlement between estranged spouses who had already obtained a divorce decree.
Bank of Baroda v. M/S Aggarwal Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and consequently the appeal filed by Bank of Baroda against a decree in favor of M/s Aggarwal Agencies Pvt. Ltd., holding that the delay was not satisfactorily explained despite COVID-19 related extensions.
M/S IONIC MSM LTD. v. SMT SITA DEVI TH. LR SUBODH KUMAR JAIN
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the Trial Court's order striking off the Defendant's defense for non-payment of arrears and dismissing the amendment application due to lack of specific pleadings on lease renewal.
Delhi State Legal Services Authority v. Chief Public Information Officer
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC order directing the Juvenile Justice Board to reconstruct destroyed records and provide RTI information to the victim's father under Section 99(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
Dinesh Madhukar Parshetye v. Abhay Shridhar Shetye
The Bombay High Court revoked probate granted on a Will obtained by fraudulent misrepresentations concealing legal heirs, holding such probate a nullity under Section 263(b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Anita Digambar Jadhav
The High Court upheld the entitlement of a niece as the nominated legal heir to receive Provident Fund and gratuity dues of a deceased employee under the Payment of Gratuity Act and Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing the Municipal Corporation's challenge.
Kum. Yasmin Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of a Muslim petitioner’s caste certificate claim by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, holding that the Vigilance Cell report was inconclusive and the Committee’s reasoned order was lawful.
Dilip Pandurang Thopate v. Ashokrao V. Thopate & Ors.
The High Court upheld the disqualification of the petitioner from a cooperative society election under Section 73-CA of the MCS Act, affirming the admissibility of RTI-obtained documents and limiting interference under Article 227 to cases of no evidence or perversity.
Ashna Roy v. ITC Limited
The High Court allowed ITC Limited's appeal, setting aside the Rs. 2 crore compensation awarded for deficiency in hairstyling service and remanded the matter for reconsideration after allowing the consumer to produce evidence substantiating her claims.
ITC LIMITED v. AASHNA ROY
The Supreme Court set aside an excessive compensation award for hair styling negligence due to lack of evidence and remanded the matter for fresh quantification based on proper proof.
Ropen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Central Government & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra State Government's prohibition on aggregation of non-transport vehicles pending policy review, dismissed the petitioner's challenge to license rejection, and allowed the petitioner to seek remedy before the High Court.
Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's authority to prohibit pooling of non-transport vehicles by aggregators pending committee review and directed challenges to such notifications be pursued under Article 226 before the High Court.
Ropen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Central Government and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra government's prohibition on aggregation of non-transport vehicles pending safety review, affirming state regulatory authority and directing challenges to be made before the High Court.
Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's authority to prohibit pooling of non-transport vehicles by aggregators pending detailed consideration, directing challenges to be pursued under Article 226 and refusing to entertain the petitioners' challenge under Article 32.
Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction in money-laundering cases under PMLA depends on the place where any constituent act of money-laundering occurred and that such jurisdictional issues require factual determination by the trial court.