Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ridhima Jain v. M/S Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against a non-signatory and non-partner petitioner under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour, holding that mere association does not attract liability.
Mukesh Kumar v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the accused in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and lack of unimpeachable evidence at the bail stage.
Mohit Mittal v. Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Banking Ombudsman's closure of complaints regarding disputed bank debits, holding that alternative remedies exist and writ jurisdiction is not appropriate for disputed factual issues.
Ram Chander Prasad v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC where the petitioner, as actual owner by sale and possession, did not dishonestly misrepresent himself as registered owner, holding that essential ingredients of cheating were not made out.
Mehbooba Mufti v. Joint Secretary (PSP) and Chief Passport Officer
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the appellate authority under the Passports Act set aside the passport refusal and remanded the matter for reexamination with directions to decide expeditiously.
Nuray Realtech Private Limited v. ICICI Bank Ltd and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's challenge to the auction of mortgaged property, without granting interim relief against auction confirmation.
Babuji Sahu alias Fauji v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail on humanitarian grounds for medical recovery, with a clear directive that no further extensions would be granted.
Akshiv Avikshit v. GOVTOF NCT OF DELHI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC following a voluntary settlement and compensation awarded to the deceased's family.
Yashpal Gaur & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary mutual settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the encouragement of amicable resolutions.
Mayank Gupta v. M/S Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of condonation of delay application for filing affidavit of admission/denial beyond prescribed timelines, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural requirements under the Commercial Courts Act and CPC.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Sher Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside an Industrial Tribunal award reinstating a workman due to lack of proof of employment, holding that wages paid under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act constitute adequate compensation.
K R Chitra v. Secretary General Supreme Court of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Supreme Court Bar Association to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioner's chamber allotment application within four months, emphasizing prompt administrative action especially for senior citizens.
Cardinal Mar George Alencherry v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's cognizance and summons against the Archbishop for alleged criminal conspiracy in alienation of church properties, dismissed appeals challenging these, and quashed the High Court's subsequent overreaching orders beyond its jurisdiction.
Premchand v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, emphasizing the accused's right to explain under Section 313 CrPC and the absence of premeditation.
Premchand v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to section 300 IPC, emphasizing the importance of considering the accused's written statement under section 313 CrPC and the surrounding circumstances.
Indore Development Authority v. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Sneh Nagar
The Supreme Court held that substantial steps taken within three years suffice to prevent lapse of a town development scheme under Section 54 of the Madhya Pradesh Adhiniyam and upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings despite procedural objections.
Indore Vikas Pradhikaran v. Burhani Grih Nirmaan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a town planning scheme does not lapse under Section 54 if sufficient steps towards implementation are taken within three years, upheld the validity of land acquisition notifications and delegation under the Land Acquisition Act, and restored the acquisition and Plan No. 97 quashed by the High Court.
Indore Development Authority v. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Sneh Nagar
The Supreme Court held that substantial steps towards implementation within three years prevent lapse of a town development scheme and upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings despite procedural objections.
Debidutta Mohanty v. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a lease granted on the basis of a solvency certificate improperly issued in an individual's name instead of the Trust is void ab initio, and the Collector validly cancelled the lease, reversing the High Court's order.
cd15e5cf730bfaf7868f390c33142fea1f60aea134df0b28daab2f1fc91f2e32
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of revenue records related to loan security documents under the OMMC Act, 2016, must follow statutory procedure and upheld the validity of the loan security document, setting aside the High Court's cancellation order.