Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. Sh. Salauddin
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's imposition of costs on the Union of India for adjournment due to counsel empanelment delays, allowing the petition.
Veena Khanuja v. Arun Khurana
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the Trial Court's interim injunction in favor of the respondent in a suit for specific performance of contract relating to the roof of a property.
Sarita Chaudhry v. Sanyogita Ghei & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint in a partition suit to challenge a registered sale deed discovered during trial, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity of litigation and adherence to procedural fairness.
Kasturi Lal Vig (Deceased) through his Legal Representative & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a notification declaring Village Sultanpur as a Low Density Residential Area under the Delhi Development Act superseded the Delhi Land Reforms Act, rendering subsequent orders under the latter without jurisdiction and quashed those orders accordingly.
Gade Inna Reddy and Anr. v. Government of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition permitting a two-day seminar subject to conditions ensuring participant details are shared with police and no untoward incidents occur, balancing the right to assemble with public order.
Siddhant Shangle v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a construction contract after the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator within the stipulated time.
M/S Mubarak Overseas Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a new sole arbitrator under Section 11(6)(c) of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate unresolved disputes after setting aside the prior arbitral award.
Dorco Co. Ltd. v. Durga Enterprises and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the respondent’s trademark registration for non-use and dishonest adoption, affirming the petitioner’s prior rights under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
M/S SHREE RATHNAM RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S VRINDA VAN FOODS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Franchise Agreement, affirming the arbitrability of the issues.
Prem Chand v. Government of N.C.T. Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the immediate release of terminal benefits to a retired teacher, holding that financial constraints do not justify withholding earned retiral dues.
Kundan Lal Mahesh Chand v. Padam Chand Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order based on bona fide requirement under the DRC Act, ruling that earlier withdrawal of eviction petition does not bar fresh proceedings and unsupported tenant claims of alternative accommodation do not raise triable issues.
Niranjan Majumdar v. Tejpal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte eviction order as premature, holding that the Supreme Court's pandemic orders excluding limitation periods apply to the filing of leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Babu Ram Gupta v. Chander Prakash
Delhi High Court held that a tenant cannot dispute landlord's ownership once landlord-tenant relationship is admitted, upheld landlord's bonafide requirement for eviction, and allowed eviction with six months' stay.
Tapas Chatterjee v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld refusal of a patent application for a process recovering potassium sulphate, holding it non-patentable under Section 3(d) and lacking inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.
M/S. DEWAN CHAND v. M/S B.P.T.P. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking substitution of an appointed arbitrator, holding that Section 11 of the Arbitration Act does not permit such substitution without valid termination of the arbitrator's mandate.
M/S DEWAN CHAND v. M/S B.P.T.P.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking substitution of an arbitrator appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court lacks jurisdiction to replace an arbitrator without cogent reasons or termination of mandate.
Sh. Siddhant Shangle v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between the petitioner and Government of NCT of Delhi.
Anarock Property Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Guru Raghavendra Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to respond to the notice for appointment, thereby facilitating arbitration of the contractual dispute.
Shobhana Gupta v. Atlas Cycles Haryana Ltd
In absence of a written arbitration agreement, a Section 11 petition for appointment of arbitrator under the Arbitration Act is not maintainable despite MSMED Act provisions deeming arbitration agreement post failed conciliation.
Deepak Sharma v. Cholamandalam MS Gen Ins Co
The Delhi High Court set aside a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award for prematurely closing the claimant's evidence on the first date fixed without considering his pending medical examination application, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.