Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Land Acquisition Collector v. B.S. Dhillon
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken or compensation tendered, overruling earlier contrary precedents.
National Capital Territory of Delhi Government v. M/s Bliss Hospital Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser of land after acquisition notifications under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has no locus to challenge the acquisition proceedings, setting aside the High Court's order allowing such a challenge.
Delhi Government v. M/s Bliss Hoptej Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser of land has no locus standi to challenge acquisition proceedings once the original claimants have not done so and the acquisition has attained finality.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser of land after the Section 4 notification has no locus standi to challenge the acquisition or its lapsing, setting aside the High Court's order declaring the acquisition deemed lapsed.
The State of Karnataka v. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that purchasing dealers must prove actual physical movement of goods and genuineness of transactions beyond invoices and cheque payments to claim Input Tax Credit under Section 70 of the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003, and allowed the State's appeal denying ITC where such proof was absent.
The State of Karnataka v. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that purchasing dealers must prove actual physical movement of goods and genuineness of transactions beyond invoices and cheque payments to claim Input Tax Credit under Section 70 of the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003, and allowed the State's appeals disallowing ITC where such proof was lacking.
M/S PRIME INTERGLOBE PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S SUPER MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing a Section 34 petition can be reckoned from the disposal of any Section 33 application regardless of the applicant, procedural defects in filing are curable, and condoned delay beyond three months within 30 days to admit the petition.
Reena v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 326 IPC based on an amicable settlement between husband and wife, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Mahendra Solanki v. Commissioner of Police & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and reinstated a police constable whose termination for non-disclosure of a trivial, acquitted criminal case was held to be unjustified without fair consideration of all relevant facts.
H.P. Singh v. Jasbir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to set aside an ex parte decree, holding the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance and the application was time barred.
Vinod Aggarwal Trading as Vaneet Sales Corporation v. Meera Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the trademark 'BAL BIHARI SUPER' registered by the respondent, holding it deceptively similar and dishonestly adopted in violation of the petitioner’s prior trademark rights.
Ravi Kapoor v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious murder case under the MCOC Act, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and advanced trial stage despite the petitioner's prolonged custody.
Smt. Kailasho v. Smt. Parmeshwari Devi
The Delhi High Court restrained both parties from creating third party rights in the disputed property during the pendency of the suit, modifying the trial court's dismissal of the appellant's injunction application.
Naveen Kumar v. Savita
The Delhi High Court held that the Family Court at Delhi had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the divorce petition since the parties last resided together and the respondent resides in Delhi, setting aside the order returning the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Aviral Education Welfare and Cultural Society v. Delhi Public School Society
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a Joint Venture Agreement between AEWCS and DPSS, holding that purely contractual disputes lacking public law elements are not maintainable under writ jurisdiction.
Holistic Farms Pvt. Ltd v. Gaon Sabha Rajokri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that urbanisation notification under Section 507 of the DMC Act extinguishes applicability of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, requiring dismissal of pending proceedings under the DLR Act for land in Village Rajokri.
Sikander v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, rejecting the appellant's alibi and other defenses.
Bijita Nayak v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the University cannot be directed to fill vacant postgraduate seats after the admission cutoff date, emphasizing adherence to merit and academic schedules.
M/S Mubarak Overseas Private Limited v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court appointed a new sole arbitrator to adjudicate unresolved disputes after the previous arbitral award was set aside, with parties’ consent.
D.T.C. v. Salek Chand
The High Court held that a valid domestic enquiry conducted in accordance with natural justice and supported by prima facie evidence must be approved under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's contrary orders.