Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Brij Bhushan Kathuria v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Look Out Circular cannot restrict the travel of an independent director without a cognizable offence, modifying the LOC to allow free travel subject to periodic reporting and undertakings.
Raj Kumar Gandhi v. Chand Rattan Bagri & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of pending interlocutory applications under Orders XXXIX Rule 10, 1 Rule 10, and XII Rule 6 of CPC without adjournments.
Sanjay Rathore v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the discharge order and declined to interfere with the Armed Forces Tribunal's interim order, holding that the discharge is subject to the Tribunal's final decision.
Ornate Agencies Private Limited v. ACIT Circle 19(1) New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings for AY 2017-18 due to lack of quantification of escaped income and absence of required approval, emphasizing that reopening cannot be based on mere change of opinion.
DBS Bank India Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal proceedings pending against a bank prior to its non-voluntary amalgamation may continue against the transferee bank unless expressly abated, and stayed the summoning order against DBS Bank pending RBI's clarification on the scheme's interpretation.
Gayatri Balu v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court set aside a disciplinary order against a JNU student for violation of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of a fair hearing before adverse administrative action.
Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court clarified that compulsory retirement with pensionary benefits does not amount to a stigma but refused to reinstate the petitioner or grant further benefits.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Veena Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that the employer-employee relationship was admitted and the scope of appeal is limited to substantial questions of law, thereby upholding the compensation awarded to the claimants.
Experion Developers Pvt Ltd v. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that External Development Charges paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority are statutory fees not liable for TDS deduction under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the AO's demand orders.
Punjab National Bank v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a secured creditor with a registered security interest under SARFAESI Act has priority over State Tax Authority's attachment under MVAT Act when the latter fails to register its charge with CERSAI, quashing the attachment order and directing transfer of the secured asset to auction purchasers.
Ravindra Arvind Bande v. Vijaya Manohar Bande
The High Court quashed the cancellation of the petitioner’s market stall licence for failure to provide a hearing, upheld the finality of appellate orders under the Act, and remitted the matter for fresh decision with due process.
Mansi Bhavin Dharani v. Bhavin Jagdish Dharani
The Bombay High Court set aside a Family Court decree of divorce granted on admission due to lack of unequivocal admission and directed the petition to be heard on merits.
Uday Padmakar Sirsat v. Rupali Uday Sirsat
The Bombay High Court upheld a divorce decree on grounds of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, confirming the return of the wife’s streedhan and rejecting the husband’s appeal.
Vinay Minda v. Income Tax Commissioner
The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for reassessment following search and seizure under the Income Tax Act begins from the date of the last panchnama prepared, not the date of the last search warrant.
Anil Minda and Others v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for block assessments under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act begins from the date of the last Panchnama drawn, not the date of the last search authorization.
Vinil Minda v. Income Tax Commissioner
The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for lock-in assessments under the Income Tax Act begins from the date of the last panchnama prepared during the search, not from the date of the last search authorization.
Anil Minda and Others v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Supreme Court held that the two-year limitation period for block assessments under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act starts from the date of the last Panchnama drawn, not the last search authorization.
State of Tripura v. Chandan Deb
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 as a valid machinery provision for tax deduction at source on transfer of right to use goods, reversing the High Court's declaration of ultra vires.
The State of Tripura v. Chandan Deb
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 as a valid machinery provision for tax deduction at source, reversing the High Court's declaration of ultra vires and affirming tax liability on transfer of right to use goods under the Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976.
Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court held that parole periods granted under lawful authority do not count towards the total sentence period, dismissing the convict's petition challenging this exclusion.