Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
ADO India Pvt. Ltd. v. ATS Housing Private Limited
Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a sole arbitrator, holding that invocation of arbitration was valid despite prior MSME proceedings, and referred the parties to arbitration for dispute resolution.
Himanshu Bhatt v. India Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to HRA and SPA only on 50% back wages as per the Division Bench’s order and directed the employer to regulate salary for the period of unauthorized absence by a speaking order.
Through: Mr. Baldeo Sharan, Advocate v. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under section 304-A IPC for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and the credibility of eyewitness evidence.
Kent RO Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Pushpendra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Kent RO Systems against Defendant 1 for infringing its registered water purifier design, affirming the validity and subsistence of the design registration and rejecting challenges based on prior publication and expiry.
Nitesh Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition directing a fresh medical examination by a Medical Board for a candidate declared medically unfit, holding the Board's report final and binding and permitting further selection if found fit.
Surendra Lal Mahendra v. Late Sh. B. Lal Mahendra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to amend the plaint to challenge a Conveyance Deed and granted interim injunction restraining defendants from alienating the disputed industrial property pending suit resolution.
Bhushan Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Rajinder Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree of partition on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting the defendant's plea of oral partition during the deceased owner's lifetime as legally unsustainable.
Rahul Yadav & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretionary grant of pardon to an accused turning approver under Sections 306 and 307 CrPC, emphasizing that prosecution approval is not mandatory and reasons for pardon can be satisfied by recorded statements and reasoned orders.
Subhash Chand v. Balkishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging closure of the defendant’s right to file written statement and lead evidence, holding that unchallenged closure orders bind the parties and procedural errors do not confer substantive rights.
Dayalbagh Educational Institute Deemed University v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed students admitted under interim permission to complete their B.H.M.S. course despite denial of formal recognition, affirming deemed permission under the Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973.
Abdul Rauf Javed v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a shop license post eviction upheld by the Supreme Court, holding the claim barred by final adjudication and constituting abuse of process.
Vijender Gupta v. Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a one-year suspension of an MLA for violating the graded suspension limits under Assembly Rules, reaffirming the constitutional right to representation and adherence to procedural fairness.
M/S. AUTOMOBILES ASSOCIATION OF UPPER INDIA v. BANSRAJ SHUKLA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that applications under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act are independent and must be decided expeditiously, affirming the employer's liability to pay wages during the pendency of litigation even if the reinstatement award is stayed.
Naveen Bathla v. M/S Youth Destination & Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator despite an arbitration clause providing for two arbitrators, affirming that an even number of arbitrators does not invalidate the arbitration agreement.
Ashok Kumar v. M S Panex Overseas & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of an ESIC-insured workman seeking compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, holding that Section 53 of the ESIC Act bars such claims when covered under ESIC and that compensation can be claimed either under the Motor Vehicles Act or the Employees Compensation Act but not both.
State v. Sanjay @ Surender Kharb
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused at the charge framing stage due to lack of admissible evidence disclosing grave suspicion under Sections 302, 365, 201, and 120B IPC.
INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. AIR LIQUIDE NORTH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be invoked to remit an arbitral award for reconsideration of evidence omitted by the arbitrator, limiting its scope to curing deficiencies in reasoning.
Capt. Amitabh Rajan and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that post-privatisation Air India employees have no vested right to occupy government-owned company accommodation and directed vacation by 31.07.2023 while declaring unlawful penal rent deductions without due process.
Pradeep Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interest on pension arrears and compensation, holding that delay and laches barred the claim after pension and arrears were paid pursuant to an earlier order.
Maryada Purushotam College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 17 of the NCTE Act and the applicable SOP.