Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nirpender Kumar v. Director General CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and stayed the transfer order until such decision.
Havna Bhartendu Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending leave application within ten days, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Prasanna and Others v. Mudegowda
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that a suit for possession filed within six months of prior litigation declaring title is not barred by limitation, confirming Mudegowda's valid title and possession over the property.
Rajiv Kumar Jindal v. B. C. I. Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the sole bidder's offer for a sick company's asset sale due to non-compliance with mandatory bank guarantee and payment conditions, affirming the validity of the subsequent sale process under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985.
Rajiv Kumar Jindal and Others v. BCI Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of a defective auction sale of sick company assets due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural guidelines and absence of competitive bidding.
Rajiv Kumar Jindal v. B. C. I. Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the sole bidder's offer for sick company assets due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural rules, emphasizing the necessity of strict adherence to sale conditions under the Sick Industrial Companies Act.
Rajiv Kumar Jindal and Others v. BCI Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of auction confirmation due to non-compliance with statutory valuation and payment guidelines, emphasizing the necessity of competitive bidding and procedural fairness in asset sales under the Sick Industrial Companies Act.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Rachna Wills & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions under the Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act require mandatory approval by the District Inspector of Schools, and amended regulations apply to all pending selections, invalidating appointments without such approval.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rachna Hills
The Supreme Court held that mandatory DIOS approval is essential for teacher appointments in minority institutions, rejecting the concept of deemed appointment and applying amended selection Regulations even to pending proposals.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Rachna Wills & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions require DIOS approval and that amendments to selection rules apply prospectively, protecting vested rights of candidates selected before the amendments.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rachna Hills
The Supreme Court held that teacher appointments in minority institutions under the Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act require mandatory DIOS approval, no deemed appointment arises from delay, and amended rules apply to pending selections.
Union of India and Others v. Ex L/NK Bijender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from stroke, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service attribution.
Prasanna Laxmikant Joshi & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that spousal consent is not required under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 for organ donation between near relatives and allowed a kidney transplant despite the donor's estranged spouse's objections.
Tadavi Yasin Supdu & Ors. v. The Additional Collector, Raigad & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that land valuation for payment of consideration under Section 36-A MLR Code must be based on the ready reckoner rates prevailing on the date of application when delay in processing is not attributable to the applicant.
Dr. B. Sukumar v. Indira Gandhi National Open University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking retrospective promotion on grounds of inordinate delay and laches, affirming that stale service claims disturbing settled seniority are barred by law.
Nisha Priya Bhatia v. CPIO, Directorate of Estates, Ministry of Urban Development & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption under Section 24 of the RTI Act for information relating to RAW, dismissing the petition as no corruption or human rights violation was established to override the exemption.
Rajeev Srivastava and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 409, and 120B IPC arising from a commercial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rachana Aswal and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that e-stamp paper does not expire after six months and directed the DDA to execute the conveyance deed using the originally purchased e-stamp paper despite delays caused by the pandemic and the death of a joint purchaser.
Satya Prakash @ Satprakash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a private dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Sartaj Singh v. S. Jagjit Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside the abatement of an appeal due to unexplained delay in substituting legal representatives of deceased parties under Order XXII CPC, resulting in dismissal of the appeal as abated.