Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mamta Rani v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging traffic barricades near Supreme Court and High Court premises, holding that traffic regulation is an executive policy matter beyond judicial interference absent mala fide or illegality.
Rajeev Jain and Others v. Ashtech Industries Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that directors are not automatically liable under Section 138 NI Act unless shown to be in charge and responsible, quashing proceedings against non-executive and additional directors lacking specific allegations or evidence of involvement.
Sumit Solanki v. Energy Efficiency Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that fixed tenure contractual employees with explicit terms excluding absorption have no right to regularization, and the employer's decision to halt absorption and conduct fresh recruitment is valid under constitutional and legal principles.
Dayawati (deceased) through LRs v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of the husband and stepchildren of a deceased petitioner as her legal representatives in a probate petition, clarifying that such impleadment is procedural and does not decide substantive rights under the Hindu Succession Act.
Abhishek Boinpally v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of Abhishek Boinpally in a PMLA money laundering case linked to Delhi Excise Policy scam, holding that prima facie material satisfies twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA.
Benoy Babu v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Pernod Ricard employee Benoy Babu in a money laundering case linked to the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22, holding that involvement in activities connected with proceeds of crime under PMLA warrants denial of bail.
Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court dismissed Manish Sisodia's bail plea in a money laundering case involving alleged manipulation of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 to facilitate kickbacks and proceeds of crime.
Bhansali Industries v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court set aside an unreasoned GST adjudication order for failure to provide reasons and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording a personal hearing.
Uggarsain v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court modified disparate sentences of multiple accused convicted under Section 304 Part II read with Section 149 IPC, emphasizing proportionality and uniformity in sentencing for joint offences.
भारतीय खाद्य निगम कार्यकारी कर्मचारी यूनियन v. त्रिनयोक्ता अर्थायत्
The Supreme Court held that FCI management cannot repudiate long-accepted reinstatement and back wages awarded to illegally terminated workers, applying the principle of approbate and reprobate.
Food Corporation of India Executive Staff Union v. Employer in relation to the Management
The Supreme Court upheld reinstatement, back wages, and regularization of casual workers after the employer voluntarily implemented the Award and absorbed them in service for over 18 years, applying the doctrine of approbate and reprobate to estop the employer from challenging the Award.
M/S. SANVIRA INDUSTRIES v. RAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld that RPC import allocations must be based on production capacities certified by valid consents as of 09.10.2018, dismissing claims for increased quotas based on later certifications.
Sanveera Industries v. RINL
The court upheld that Raw Petroleum Coke import quotas must be allocated based on production capacities certified as on the Supreme Court's cutoff date, rejecting post-cutoff capacity increases for quota enhancement.
M/S. SANVIRA INDUSTRIES v. RAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld that RPC import allocations must be based on production capacities recognized as of 09.10.2018, rejecting Sanvira's claim for increased quota based on later capacity certifications.
Neeraj Kumar & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed review petitions directing the Government of Haryana to recognize Kurukshetra University Diplomas as equivalent for recruitment to Art & Craft Teacher posts and to appoint eligible candidates accordingly without disturbing prior appointments.
Neeraj Kumar & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed review petitions directing the State of Haryana to recognize the equivalence of Kurukshetra University Diplomas for Art & Craft Teacher recruitment and appoint eligible candidates accordingly without disturbing prior appointments.
Union of India & Ors. v. AVM Nitin Manmohan Desai (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired officer, affirming that disabilities detected during service are presumed attributable to military service unless clearly disproved.
Nirmal Singh v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 306 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone by the appellant considering the elapsed time and his conduct.
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Mina Kashinath Zanje & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award holding MSRTC liable for compensation to the deceased’s family, affirming that civil liability is independent of criminal acquittal and that full salary including family-benefiting allowances must be considered for compensation.
Pravinbhai Ratanji Lad and Ors. v. The Office of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Anr.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a 34-year delayed writ petition challenging a slum declaration order for lack of locus, delay, and non-maintainability under Article 227, imposing exemplary costs on the petitioners.