Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-18 v. M/S Sumitomo Corporation India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals challenging the Tribunal's application of TNMM with Berry ratio as the appropriate method for transfer pricing of indenting transactions, affirming the Tribunal's detailed factual and legal analysis.
Devender Kumar Kashyap v. Chander Muni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the setting aside of an arbitral award due to flawed unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator, permitting a fresh appointment petition under Section 11 of the A&C Act.
Kamal Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant wrongfully retired on medical grounds without following procedure and subsequently reinstated is entitled to salary and benefits for the intervening period treated as duty.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Chitra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award of 60% whole body disability and compensation to a homemaker amputee, emphasizing functional impact over mechanical disability calculations.
Okaya Power Private Limited v. Manoj Bansal Trading as Mahadev Electric Store
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the trademark "OKAWA" from the register following the respondent's voluntary disclaimer and consent.
b9aaaaa0e0af5ec7ee4a40bce7804a9a7334868960ab85e5bb00ac7fb8385d18
The court upheld the constitutional validity of 75% SC and 25% ST reservation in government jobs, directing effective monitoring and transparency in implementation.
RANJEET SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, emphasizing the need for credible and corroborated evidence.
Mathyu Alexander v. Muhammad Shafi & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order quashing the final investigation report in a fatal motor accident case, emphasizing proper application of criminal procedural law and standards of proof for negligence.
Mathew Alexander v. Mohammed Shafi
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing a final report after further investigation by making findings of fact, and clarified that such reports should not be quashed on merits, while emphasizing the distinct standards of proof in criminal and compensation claims.
ANKITA BHATI v. DEV RAJ SINGH BHATI
The Supreme Court allowed transfer of both divorce and related criminal proceedings from Rajasthan to Himachal Pradesh, prioritizing the wife's convenience and judicial efficiency in matrimonial disputes.
Delhi Vikas Aadhikaran v. Tham Yath
The Supreme Court held that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act does not apply where possession was taken before its commencement and condoned delay in appeal with penalty.
Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Singh
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken before the 2013 Act's commencement, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order directing compensation under the 2013 Act.
Ram Lubhaya Sehgal & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380, 448, 457, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and promote social harmony.
Azad Singh and Anr v. The State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a 2017 FIR under Sections 365/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, imposing a condition to plant trees as social good.
FMC Corporation & Anr. v. Modern Insecticides Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a patent infringement suit as infructuous after the patent expired during the pendency of the case.
Kuldeep Singh v. Poonam Rani
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce by setting aside the family court's judgment based on an amicable settlement between the parties.
Naveen Kumar v. Jaswant Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal against dismissal of a motor accident claim petition for non-prosecution due to Covid-19, emphasizing the Act's beneficial nature and granting a further opportunity to lead evidence.
Manish Kumar v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 66A IT Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC while imposing costs for prolonged litigation.
Pramod Gopan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating and criminal breach of trust FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement and full payment by the petitioner, emphasizing the Court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process in commercial disputes.
THDC INDIA LTD v. M/S PCL-INTERTECH LENHYDRO CONSORTIUM JV
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a construction dispute, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 and validating claims, counterclaims, subcontracting regularization, and interest awards.