Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SALIB @ SHALU @ SALIM v. STATE OF U.P.
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against the appellant for criminal intimidation, holding that the allegations were false, fabricated, and did not disclose any cognizable offence warranting trial.
Haji Iqbal @ Bala v. Uttar Pradesh State and Others
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against the appellant for lack of specific allegations and prima facie offence, emphasizing cautious exercise of quashing powers in serious sexual offence cases.
Haji Iqbal @ Bala v. State of U.P. & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against the appellant due to absence of specific allegations against him, emphasizing the Court's power to prevent abuse of criminal process under Section 482 CrPC.
Rishita Shukla v. Daulatram College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University’s seat allocation, holding that merit-based admission rules were correctly applied and no illegality occurred in converting a vacant seat to spot counselling.
Rainbow Digital Services Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking recovery of amounts from the Department of Posts, holding that the appropriate remedy lies before the NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SUNITA
The High Court held that the competent authority must independently decide on study leave applications and set aside the Tribunal's order that effectively granted leave without such approval.
Jindal Stainless Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that refund adjustment against disputed tax demands cannot exceed 20% without a reasoned order under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, and directed release of excess amounts withheld.
Information TV Pvt Ltd v. Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing registration of the appellant's device mark in Class 41, relying on prior registration of the word mark "India News" in the same class.
Sh. Giriraj v. Sh. Rishipal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to amend the plaint challenging a long-settled compromise decree in a partition suit, emphasizing the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and the necessity of substantive evidence to reopen settled disputes.
Sanjeet Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s statutory petitions under the BSF Act within three weeks and to supply trial proceedings to the incarcerated petitioner through his counsel, ensuring timely and procedural compliance.
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the patent refusal order to the Indian Patent Office due to incorrect prior art references and procedural errors affecting the patent application's rejection.
Ajit Kumar v. Monk Trading Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that clerical amendments to a decree do not require fresh transfer orders for execution, dismissing the petition challenging execution proceedings on that ground.
Tayde Kailas Yuvraj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of candidature due to biometric mismatch, upholding the validity of biometric verification in recruitment.
Ajit Kumar v. Monk Trading Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing clerical corrections in a decree without fresh notice, dismissing the petition challenging the rectification and observations on non-appearance.
Lakhmi Chand (Through Its Legal Heirs) v. Mr. Sube Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging ex-parte and subsequent Trial Court orders in a partition suit, holding that legal heirs represented in the suit had notice and failed to timely raise objections.
Rajeev v. Hariom Kumar
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s dismissal of the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the question of cause of action and property ownership are to be decided at trial and not in revision under Section 115 CPC.
Parveen Garg v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a property-related forgery case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and absence of flight risk or evidence tampering.
Mujeeb Alam v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious consideration of the petitioner’s pending representation challenging the reinstatement date without deciding on merits or jurisdictional objections.
Abhijit Mishra v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that Google Pay, as a third-party app provider on the authorized UPI platform, does not require RBI authorization under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and dismissed petitions alleging unauthorized operations and data privacy violations.
Om Dutt Sharma v. Renu Trehan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree of partition based on admitted undivided shares without trial, dismissing baseless defenses and referring parties to mediation.