Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ashok Jaipuria v. Tejinder Kumar ACIT Central Circle 19 Income Tax Department
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial and revisional courts' orders allowing additional evidence and witness examination in an Income Tax complaint, holding that such evidence is admissible if necessary and not prejudicial to the accused.
Vibhav Kharagpuria v. School of Planning and Architecture
The Delhi High Court set aside cancellation of admission of a candidate holding a State OBC certificate, emphasizing the need for clear communication of Central List eligibility criteria and upholding equity in reservation admissions under the CEI Act, 2006.
Shaikh Abdul Khalik & Anr. v. Director General & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel denied family accommodation are entitled to HRA irrespective of seniority or quota restrictions under Rule 61, as such denial violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
Rohinish Pathak v. Medical Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Council of India's rejection of an eligibility certificate application, ruling that rounding off marks is impermissible and that Regulation 4(4) of the Screening Test Regulations is constitutionally valid.
Bhagwat Prasad v. Laxman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, holding that compensation for future loss of income and treatment is not payable without permanent disability.
Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Ministry of Defence
The Delhi High Court set aside the blacklisting of a consultant, holding that certifying the quantum of work done does not equate to certifying payment amounts, and the consultant was not liable for overpayment to the contractor.
THDC India Ltd v. Jai Prakash Associates Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld reimbursement of newly imposed entry tax and price adjustment on certain claims but set aside price adjustment on substituted items without cost analysis and barred interest payments as prohibited by contract clauses.
Sohan Lal v. Department of Personnel and Training
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the medical classification of the petitioner under locomotor disability, upholding the Tribunal's order and emphasizing adherence to competent medical reports for disability categorization in Civil Services Examination.
M/S Realtech Developments & Infrastructure (India) Pvt Ltd v. Radhakishan
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions challenging limitation and demand notice issues with liberty to raise these before the trial court.
Tushar Anuragi v. State (NCT of Delhi); Manoj Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sessions Court's dismissal of anticipatory bail applications, holding that such applications must be considered on their own merits when applicants are not in custody.
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. M/S Shreya Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an exclusive assignee of copyright can sue for infringement without joining original owners, rejected the defendant's exceptions under the Copyright Act, admitted electronic evidence, and awarded permanent injunction and damages including punitive damages for unauthorized broadcasting.
Anil Sharma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 34, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent oppressive criminal proceedings arising from a civil dispute.
Piyush Gupta v. Delhi Legal Services Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the DLSA's fresh empanelment notification, holding there was no obligation to operate the waiting list and no violation of constitutional rights.
Mohit Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent oppression and prejudice.
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 NEW DELHI v. N.R. PORTFOLIO PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviving dismissed cross objections via rectification after the High Court set aside its earlier order, affirming the doctrines of merger and finality and limiting ITAT's rectification powers under Section 254.
Narendra Bansal; Arup Chatterjjee; Karmveer v. State & Anr
The revisional court must hear the accused before remanding a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application back to the trial court, as mandated by Section 401(2) Cr.P.C. and Supreme Court precedent.
Dilshad Khan v. State
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a POCSO and IPC case, holding that custodial interrogation was not necessary and that bail could not be denied merely on apprehension of tampering without concrete evidence.
CNH Industrial (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Tirth Agro Technology Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint disclosing a cause of action for copyright infringement and other reliefs cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC merely for lack of detailed pleadings on copyright ownership.
Punit Beriwala v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable after dismissal of regular bail in a criminal fraud case involving property sale, and dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail.
Geeta Poddar v. Satya Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the incumbent Arbitrator's appointment under Clause 20 of the Buyers Agreement, distinguishing the facts from the TRF Limited precedent.