Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Manish Gupta v. M/S Oriental Quarries and Mines Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a lease agreement.
M/S BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES LTD v. LOTUS BOULEVARD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Service Agreement.
Sarla Taneja v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA must issue a fresh demand-cum-allotment letter after judicial restraint is lifted to grant time for payment, quashing cancellation and forfeiture of earnest money as arbitrary.
Tanmay Mishra; Yash Maheshwari; Krishna; Bethsy v. Dainichi Consultant Inc
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.
Manbharan Singh Yadav v. Dainichi Consultant Inc.
The Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, judicial scrutiny is limited to a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving substantive issues to arbitration.
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. PR SALES AGENCY & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon parties' mutual consent to adjudicate their disputes.
Union of India v. Rupesh Kumar Maan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to Tribunal orders condemning their destruction of examination question papers during litigation and upheld the continuation of contempt proceedings for non-disclosure and non-compliance.
Arbaz Aslam Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, holding that delayed compliance with Section 42 is permissible during patrolling and that the recovery of commercial quantity narcotics negates reasonable grounds for bail.
Aidem Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Darshan Pitale
The Bombay High Court held that gratuity cannot be forfeited under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act for acts of moral turpitude committed after cessation of employment and without prior notice.
Gurudatta Infrastructures v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with a technical requirement, holding that judicial interference in tender awards is limited to cases of mala fide or arbitrariness.
C 4 Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nashik Division
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a technical bid for non-submission of a mandatory Geo-tagging certificate, holding that judicial interference in tender matters is limited to cases of mala fide or arbitrariness.
Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed bail for a drunken driver accused of causing death by rash driving, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and risk of evidence tampering.
The State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Bhikaji Borkar & Ors.
The High Court set aside the acquittal of two public servants for demand and acceptance of bribe, holding that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the alibi plea was not established.
Aman Khan & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 IPC and POCSO based on a genuine family settlement, applying inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, while imposing costs to serve justice.
Mukesh & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under IPC and POCSO offences arising from a family dispute on compromise and victim's disowning of allegations, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS with costs.
Umesh Chandra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall its order denying interim relief against NTPC's performance appraisal, holding that such relief amounts to final relief and emphasizing the employer's prerogative in duty assignment while imposing costs for frivolous litigation.
M/S Manoj Dry Cleaners Proprietorship of Mr. Fekan Rajak v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed a commercial appeal filed with a 729-day delay, holding that negligence of legal aid counsel does not justify condonation of delay and strict limitation must be enforced.
ASM Traxim Private Limited & Ors. v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that personal hearing and full disclosure of relevant forensic audit reports are mandatory before classifying a borrower's account as 'fraud' under RBI Master Directions, quashing the impugned fraud classification order for violation of natural justice.
Bhupender v. Union of India and Ors
The High Court held that termination of service based on alleged forged domicile certificate without hearing violates natural justice and directed a fresh inquiry and reasoned order.
Union of India v. Maya Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of family pension to the widow of a temporary government servant who died in service before regularization, affirming established legal principles and prior precedents.