Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Axis Finance Limited v. Saurabh Panchal & Dhara Saurabh Panchal
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. v. Sphere Air Residency Maintenance Service Association
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement and held that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to existence of the agreement, leaving validity and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. MR. MOHD ASIF PROPRIETOR OF SARA TEXTILES AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act upon prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring substantive issues to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S XTRACOVER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. M/S ONSITE PHONES PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement.
Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V. v. Partha Chatterjee
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Tommy Hilfiger against a defendant supplying counterfeit goods bearing its registered trademarks, proceeding ex-parte due to defendant's non-appearance.
Kapil Kumar v. Life Insurance Corporation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction and damages assessed against a tenant under the Public Premises Act, ruling that the quantum of damages based on comparable leases was lawful and not subject to reappraisal at the writ stage.
Darshan Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT order on delayed retiral benefits, holding that payment of interest at GPF rates with final settlement precludes entitlement to compound interest at market rates.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Uma Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed ESIC's petition, holding that disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior permission of the competent authority violate Article 311(2) and are invalid.
STAR INXS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. ELECSHINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from the Work Order dated 09.02.2024.
Vinod Kumar v. Smt Asha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while imputing income for interim maintenance, the Family Court must apply the minimum wages applicable in the husband's State of residence, not the forum State, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration accordingly.
Manju & Anr. v. Krishan Kumar
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after finding the Family Court did not adequately consider the respondent's full income including disputed bank account credits.
Umesh Paswan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and related offences, holding that the victim was a major based on bone ossification tests with margin of error, and that credible victim testimony corroborated by DNA evidence sufficed for conviction despite delay in FIR.
Ram Kishore v. Kanwal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on res judicata or factual disputes without proper examination and evidence, setting aside the dismissal and restoring the suit.
P2 & P3 v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Ram Gopal & Ors. v. The State of Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Dharmendra Mahto v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition as the missing daughter was recovered and her custody was lawfully handed over to the petitioner.
SMT PINKI v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed a Habeas Corpus petition directing the production and custody of a recovered minor girl to her mother, emphasizing the child's welfare and wishes.
Anjar Ali Khan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 2013 MHA Guidelines barring recruitment and retention of color blind personnel in CAPFs and dismissed writ petitions challenging termination of probationers found medically unfit due to defective color vision.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/s Mirage Homes Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that no additions under Section 153A can be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during search, affirming Supreme Court precedent.
Reena Yadav v. Indian Council of Social Science Research
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the eligibility criteria and rejection of candidature in a research assistant director recruitment, holding that courts will not interfere with expert selection committees absent arbitrariness or mala fide.