Search Judgments

Through: Mr. Sarthak Maggon, Advocate v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

COLDSMITHS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. CORAM:

PAWAN KUMAR GOEL .....Plaintiff v. CORAM:

Through: Mr. Naman Gupta, Ms. Mansi Goyal, Advocates v. THE STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Adv v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Ms. Surbhi Gupta and Mr. Anant Gupta, Advocates v. SHRI GURVINDER SINGH BAKSHI

Advocates versus

Through: Mr. Nishant Kumar Saxena, Mr. Vijayant Sharma and Mr. I.K. Khare, Advocates v. STATE THROUGH SHO GTB ENCLAVE

Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, advocates v. UNION OF INDIA

Through: Mr. Hem Chand Vashisht, Advocate v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma and Mr. Rahul, Advocates v. THE STATE OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Anil Basoya, Mr. Kunal Basoya and Mr. Rohit Lohia, Advocates v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. M/s. Bombay Gymkhana Ltd.

The Bombay High Court held that in absence of an express limitation period under the ESI Act, orders imposing damages under Section 85-B must be passed within a reasonable period of five years, and set aside a damages order passed after fourteen years as time-barred.

Jitendra Gorakh Megh v. Gorakh Govind Megh

The Bombay High Court held that Section 105 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 cannot be misused as a litigation tactic to challenge an adversary's legal capacity without proper proof of mental illness and dismissed the Interim Application accordingly.

Yakub Salebhai Contractor & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

The Bombay High Court held that failure of the planning authority to acquire reserved land within statutory timelines after a purchase notice leads to automatic lapse of reservation under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, entitling the landowner to develop the land.

Gaurav Rajeshbhai Desai; Chirag Rajeshbhai Desai; Mitul Ramanbhai Desai v. Yagyanarayan Prabhunath Mishra; Shikshan Prasaran Samiti; The Education Welfare Society

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction restraining respondents from creating third-party rights in disputed property pending final adjudication, emphasizing maintenance of status quo in property disputes.

Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Haryana and Ors.

The Supreme Court held that allotments of housing flats by a government employees' welfare society must comply with eligibility criteria and principles of fairness, setting aside arbitrary preferential allotments and directing a fresh draw.

Parameshwari v. State of Tamil Nadu

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of sentence in a grievous injury case, affirming that compensation cannot substitute appropriate punishment and sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the offence.

Rohit Jangde v. The State of Chhattisgarh

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of a stepfather for his stepdaughter's murder due to flawed investigation, inadmissible Section 27 statement, incomplete DNA evidence, and failure to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy v. State C.B.I.

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for abetment of suicide and attempt to commit suicide, ruling death was due to poisoning and rejecting claims of manual strangulation or sexual assault.