Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Central Tax v. M/S SingTel Global India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that SingTel Global India Pvt. Ltd. is not an intermediary and is entitled to refund of unutilized input service credit for exported telecommunication services under the Service Tax Rules.
Kavita Tyagi v. Sunil Kumar Tyagi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal and upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce to the husband on the ground of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, considering the cumulative conduct and long separation.
Promoshirt SM SA v. Armasuisse and Another
The Delhi High Court held that Section 100-A of the CPC bars Letters Patent Appeals against Single Judge appellate orders under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, dismissing the appeals as not maintainable.
Retail Royalty Company & Anr. v. Santosh Kumar Sharma Trading as Shiv Shakti Creations
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for trademark infringement of the well-known AMERICAN EAGLE marks, with costs awarded to the plaintiffs and the defendant agreeing to cease use of the marks.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Sundeep B J Drug Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed the prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report supply provisions under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing the manufacturer's right to challenge analyst reports.
APHV India Investco Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 1 (1)(1), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax assessment and penalty orders for violation of natural justice and insufficient response time, remanding the matter for fresh proceedings with a fair hearing.
Aman Gupta v. State
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of forgery and GST evasion involving fake firms, as custodial interrogation was necessary and the petitioner abused court process.
Jai Narayan v. State
The High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sunita Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident claim award attributing 40% contributory negligence to the deceased, dismissed the insurer's appeal, and enhanced the loss of consortium compensation for the claimants.
Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. v. Coverfox Insurance Broking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that use of registered trademarks as keywords in Google AdWords constitutes 'use' under the Trade Marks Act but without actual confusion or deception, such use does not amount to infringement, dismissing plaintiffs' interim relief applications.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Abhijit Ghosh
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing the necessity of supplying samples and reports to manufacturers and judicial scrutiny before summoning.
M K Hameid & Anr. v. State through K T Raghu Kumar Drugs Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and failure to establish a prima facie case.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Sundeep B J Drugs Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla directors for non-compliance with mandatory drug sampling and reporting procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing procedural safeguards and the necessity of judicial inquiry before summoning.
M K Hameid & Anr. v. State through Abhijit Singh
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report supply provisions under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and failure of the Magistrate to apply judicial mind before summoning.
The Trustees of Princeton University v. The Vagdevi Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' prior continuous use of the mark "PRINCETON" since 1991 entitles them to protection under Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, dismissing the plaintiff's claim for injunction despite trademark infringement.
Ratan Kumar and Anr v. Santosh Jalutharia and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a landlord holding a perpetual lease from DDA qualifies as 'owner' under the Delhi Rent Control Act and is entitled to evict a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds, dismissing the tenant's challenge to ownership.
Kanav Arora v. The State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC under its inherent powers, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process given the parties' amicable settlement and factual circumstances.
Firoz and Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC where the victim voluntarily married the accused and lived with him, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Shakib Ali @ Sahil v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC based on a settlement between parties and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that such power must be exercised sparingly and with regard to the nature of the offence.
Neeta Mitroo & Others v. Deepak Sant Ram & Deepak Gupta & Others
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for cancellation of registered documents is not barred by limitation if the plaintiff acquires knowledge of the documents and alleged fraud belatedly, and dismissed the application for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.