Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/s. Stanship Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax
The Bombay High Court held that a person against whom a CGST detention order is passed can file an appeal even if tax and penalty are paid by another party on his behalf, and directed the appellate authority to admit and decide the appeal on merits.
INTERNATIONAL FOODSTUFFS CO. LLC v. VIJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND PAWAN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark dispute between International Foodstuffs Co. LLC and respondents based on a lawful settlement agreement delineating trademark rights and use.
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr v. M/S Arora Sationers and Ors
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a mutually agreed settlement concerning design infringement, binding the parties to the settlement terms and ordering partial refund of court fees.
Hemavathi & Ors. v. V. Hombegowda & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allowing a Regular Second Appeal without framing substantial questions of law and hearing all parties, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 100 CPC procedural requirements.
RPS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. v. MUKUL KUMAR & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that belated claims arising from an arbitral award cannot be admitted after approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the mandatory nature of timelines to ensure finality in insolvency proceedings.
Religare Finvest Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that criminal liability for offences committed by a dissolved bank does not transfer to the successor bank post-amalgamation, quashing proceedings against DBS Bank arising from LVB's alleged misconduct.
CBI v. R.R. Kishore
The Supreme Court held that the declaration of unconstitutionality of Section 6A(1) of the DSPE Act applies retrospectively but Article 20(1) does not protect procedural provisions like Section 6A from retrospective invalidation, allowing investigations without prior approval to continue.
Amar Shamrao Kolekar v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that detention of a bail-granted accused without lawful order is illegal and ordered his immediate release despite pending bail cancellation proceedings.
Devika Dhiraj Patil v. Dhiraj Sunil Patil
The Bombay High Court allowed the wife's application to transfer divorce proceedings from Nashik to Pune, emphasizing the wife's convenience as paramount in matrimonial transfer cases under Section 24 CPC.
Pravin Laxmidas Tanna v. Kusumben A. Kakkad
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a 2004 Will, affirming exclusive Probate Court jurisdiction and ordering probate in favor of the plaintiff after rejecting forgery and mental incapacity claims.
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited v. Triller Inc
The Bombay High Court granted summary judgment in favour of Zee Entertainment for recovery of unpaid license fees with interest, rejecting the Defendant's plea of prematurity and non-compliance with mandatory pre-suit mediation.
Baramati Agro Ltd. v. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board’s closure order against Baramati Agro Limited for procedural lapses and failure to apply the doctrine of proportionality, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Paisalo Digital Limited v. Puran Murti Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.
Sanghi Bros (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. Kamlendra Singh
The Delhi High Court held that although the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform their contract for sale of property, specific performance was denied due to revocation by the defendant, creation of third party interest, and equitable considerations.
Braham Prakash @ Khargosh v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the framing of charges under Section 307 IPC due to lack of reasoning and absence of necessary ingredients, remanding the case for appropriate charge framing.
Surender Prasad v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a muster roll employee detained on serious criminal charges under departmental policy, holding that such termination does not attract retrenchment protections under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between parties and absence of a prima facie case, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S P Bajaj v. Shaurya Housing Ltd. (In Liqn.) Through OL and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the auction sale of a liquidated company's property, ruling that reserve price below circle rate and publication in local newspapers sufficed for a valid auction.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow street vendors to vend peacefully within designated zones under valid certificates, subject to compliance with prescribed terms and conditions.
Living Media India Limited & Anr. v. Aabtak Channel.com (John Does) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the suffix 'TAK' is the dominant part of the plaintiffs' trademarks and granted permanent injunctions against defendants using confusingly similar marks incorporating 'TAK', applying the exception to the anti-dissection rule.