Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Usha Joshi v. Ashok Kumar Ahluwalia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and disposed of the suit on the basis of a lawful Settlement Agreement between the parties, directing compliance and quashing related criminal proceedings.
Unnat Nagar Division 3 Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the bifurcation of a cooperative housing society under Section 18 of the MCS Act, holding that substantial compliance with procedural requirements including consultation with the Federal Society validates the subdivision despite minor procedural deviations.
BTL EPC Ltd v. Macawber Beekay Pvt Ltd
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the appellant's bid and Letter of Intent, ruling that the consortium agreement with a foreign entity did not constitute a bidding consortium requiring registration under the Public Procurement Order, and emphasized judicial restraint in tender disputes.
19f01ed0496089312e97138ce4293342a86726de8ccc38789ce22a7289cd80d2
The court upheld the EPFO's statutory powers under the EPF Act, affirming its authority to conduct inspections and enforce compliance with procedural safeguards, dismissing challenges based on non-registration or procedural lapses.
0603b7c606ceb9c2962fd7c4c9f6d38abce1ad76eff7e94233a788b260020839
The court held that banks have jurisdiction under the 2007 Act to initiate disciplinary proceedings against officers for recovery-related misconduct but must strictly follow procedural safeguards, remanding the matter for fresh inquiry.
1f869235f546b6802cb95a01c66162fc004aec9542216c4bbfc7d1d08e24c760
The court held that recovery proceedings under the Recovery Act 2007 can only be initiated by authorized officers against borrowers, not against the bank itself, and dismissed the petition for lack of maintainability.
afc9d936d77d8c2d2658e8330d811f0948bd767eebb59951e7b1459219b3d1fc
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of service benefits and increments under Section 40(1) of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, clarifying the legal meaning of "accrue" and affirming strict statutory compliance in service law.
391548ba5d9e8208f2c38b7b25500d9250f11b38ff0d7ec745d9a6d0da2fc2a8
The court held that pension must be calculated including all sanctioned increments accrued during service under Section 40(1) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1997, allowing the appeal and setting aside the contrary High Court decision.
K C Aggarwal v. National Stock Exchange of India Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the dispute between the petitioner and ICICI Securities is subject to arbitration under the NSE’s rules and ODR mechanism, limiting arbitration to the bipartite parties and restricting judicial scrutiny at the appointment stage to the existence of the arbitration agreement.
Prowiz Mansystems Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of damages and interest on belated provident fund contributions deducted from universally paid incentives, affirming that such incentives constitute basic wages under the Employees' Provident Fund Act and that wilful delay justifies penalties.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Ashutosh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld interim admission of a meritorious candidate to AIIMS despite delay in obtaining NOC, emphasizing fairness over strict timelines where no fault lies with the candidate.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central-1 v. VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing the respondent's deduction for bad debts acquired from its predecessor and the full training expenses under the Income Tax Act for AY 2011-12.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deduction of bad debts acquired from a predecessor under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Harihara Ravi Iyer v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Girish Lohiya & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 452/34 IPC in a family property dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under section 482 CrPC.
Shalendra v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of compassionate appointment due to inordinate delay, prior monetary benefits, and relevant criminal proceedings, affirming that compassionate appointment is a limited, non-vested right intended for immediate financial relief.
Punjab National Bank v. Ram Murti Devi Alias Murti Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the award of ex-gratia compensation with interest to the deceased employee's kin, ruling that interest is payable for delay in payment even absent explicit provision in the scheme.
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC v. SANJEEV GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit in favor of the plaintiff based on a lawful settlement wherein defendants admitted patent validity and ceased infringing activities, granting a permanent injunction.
Neelam & Anr. v. Gaurav & Anr.
The High Court dismissed appeals challenging the MACT's dismissal of motor accident claims, holding that compensation under Section 163A cannot be awarded without cogent evidence that the respondent was driving the stolen vehicle at the time of the accident.
Sh Sachin Kumar @ Bala v. The State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.