Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Zaibi Hussain v. Jamal Tariq
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to promptly decide its jurisdiction and dispose of the petitioner’s interim custody application under the Guardians and Wards Act without undue adjournments.
GAIL INDIA LTD v. M/S ADVANCE INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an interim restraining order and dismissed the Section 9 arbitration petition as withdrawn without deciding on the merits, reserving all rights.
Baljor v. Suraj Bhan
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 17,000 per month for a commercial shop pending final adjudication, directing interim payments and referring the parties to mediation.
Kordient Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to seek revocation of GST registration cancellation and directed reconsideration of the application to amend the principal place of business due to lack of reasoned orders and procedural fairness.
Parshant Jain v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied where the petitioner’s modus operandi indicated dishonest intention to misappropriate goods and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the money trail.
Krishna Dutta Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to expeditiously decide the petitioners' statutory petition under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968, and declined to interfere judicially at this stage.
P. V. Vijayaraghavan & Ors. v. Nityam Software Solution Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that serious irregularities including votes cast by deceased persons and breach of secret ballot principle vitiate the IOA 2020 elections, allowing the plaintiffs' application to restrain defendants from functioning.
Satbir Singh v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider the petitioner's monetary claim on merits without being barred by limitation, given the admitted shortage of funds.
Sunil Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304A IPC on the basis of accidental death and settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Md. Shahid @ Munna Builder v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a builder accused of trespass and forgery in a property dispute, holding that prima facie forged documents and mala fide conduct justify denial of bail despite completion of investigation.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Mahender Singh
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, a valid domestic enquiry finding unauthorized absence as misconduct warrants approval of dismissal, and the Tribunal erred in refusing approval based solely on leave without pay entries.
Sanjay Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful arrest and remand of a politician under PMLA, affirming compliance with statutory safeguards and rejecting claims of illegal arrest and malice.
Hargopal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation under the MACP Scheme and decide it within eight weeks, dismissing the writ petition without adjudicating on merits.
Wills John v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA cannot cancel a flat allotment without notice after acceptance of confirmation deposit and payments, directing possession to be handed over to the petitioner.
The Director General of Police Tamilnadu, Mylapore v. J. Raghunees
Non-disclosure of prior involvement in a criminal case, despite acquittal, amounts to suppression of material facts disentitling a candidate from appointment to police service.
The State of Telangana & Ors. v. M/s Tirumala Constructions
The Supreme Court held that States' power to amend pre-GST tax laws under Section 19 of the 101st Amendment is limited to making them consistent with the GST regime, invalidating retrospective and expansive amendments beyond this scope.
Nikesh Kumar v. Suman Devi
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dissolved the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142(1), setting terms for maintenance and property settlement.
Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad v. M/S Urmin Products
The Supreme Court upheld the Revenue's demand for differential excise duty and penalty, holding that the assessee wilfully misclassified 'zarda/jarda scented tobacco' as 'chewing tobacco' to evade higher duty, justifying invocation of extended limitation under Section 11A.
Tamil Nadu and Puducherry Paper Cup Manufactures Association v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld Tamil Nadu's ban on reinforced paper cups under environmental protection laws but remanded the ban on non-woven polypropylene bags for reconsideration in light of amended plastic waste rules.
Manmohan Gopal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr
The Supreme Court directed sale and transfer of ancestral property to satisfy maintenance arrears owed to a daughter-in-law, exercising its powers under Article 142 to ensure complete justice despite foreign divorce and contested liability of father-in-law.