Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sushma v. Sarbjit Singh Arora; Sarbjit Singh Arora v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court allowed execution sale of a property subject to a decree, recognizing the purchaser's statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act and directing disbursal of sale proceeds as per parties' consent.
Shashi Kant Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of accused involved in fraudulent GST transactions, holding custodial interrogation necessary due to their evasive conduct during investigation.
PUMA SE v. ASHOK KUMAR
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Puma SE against a defendant manufacturing and selling counterfeit 'PUMA' products, relying on an unchallenged Local Commissioner report as evidence.
Md. Shahid @ Munna Builder v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a criminal case involving alleged forgery and conspiracy to claim ownership of property, holding that the matter involves serious criminal allegations beyond a mere civil dispute.
Kumari Laxmi v. Rama Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent partition suit for properties not included in a previous suit pending in another jurisdiction is maintainable and set aside the stay granted under Section 10 CPC.
M/S Highways Engineering Consultant v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the debarment of a consultancy firm for breach of contract, holding that mere contractual breaches compensated by penalties do not justify punitive debarment absent fraud or gross misconduct.
Kunal Structure India Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Instapower Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to allow filing of a written statement beyond the statutory 120-day period, holding that delay due to resignation of officials does not constitute exceptional circumstances for condonation under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.
A.S. v. D.S.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay fixed interim maintenance and educational expenses to his wife and younger child.
Rahul Dilip Shah v. The Catalyst Trusteeship Limited & Ors.
The court held that the debenture trustee is entitled to exercise voting rights over pledged shares upon continuing events of default, dismissing the plaintiff's application to restore voting rights despite loan restructuring.
Pinki Irani v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted bail to Pinki Irani in an MCOCA case, holding that prima facie evidence did not conclusively establish her membership in the organized crime syndicate and that stringent bail conditions under Section 21(4) were not met.
Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd. v. M/s Sheena Exports & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Recovery Officer of DRT-II to expedite recovery proceedings and dispose of attached properties within six months in a petition filed under Article 227.
Zaibi Hussain v. Jamal Tariq
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to promptly decide its jurisdiction and dispose of the petitioner’s interim custody application under the Guardians and Wards Act without undue adjournments.
GAIL INDIA LTD v. M/S ADVANCE INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an interim restraining order and dismissed the Section 9 arbitration petition as withdrawn without deciding on the merits, reserving all rights.
Baljor v. Suraj Bhan
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 17,000 per month for a commercial shop pending final adjudication, directing interim payments and referring the parties to mediation.
Kordient Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to seek revocation of GST registration cancellation and directed reconsideration of the application to amend the principal place of business due to lack of reasoned orders and procedural fairness.
Parshant Jain v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied where the petitioner’s modus operandi indicated dishonest intention to misappropriate goods and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the money trail.
Krishna Dutta Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to expeditiously decide the petitioners' statutory petition under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968, and declined to interfere judicially at this stage.
P. V. Vijayaraghavan & Ors. v. Nityam Software Solution Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that serious irregularities including votes cast by deceased persons and breach of secret ballot principle vitiate the IOA 2020 elections, allowing the plaintiffs' application to restrain defendants from functioning.
Satbir Singh v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider the petitioner's monetary claim on merits without being barred by limitation, given the admitted shortage of funds.
Sunil Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304A IPC on the basis of accidental death and settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.