Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
C. Anil Chandran v. M.K. Raghavan
The Supreme Court upheld retrospective promotion granted to diploma-holder respondents without prejudice to a graduate appellant due to separate promotion quotas and dismissed the appellant's challenge to seniority adjustment.
Bhisham Lal Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
The Supreme Court held that a second petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging grounds available at the time of the first petition is not maintainable absent changed circumstances, dismissing the petitioner’s plea to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order.
Sudhir Singh and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
The Supreme Court held that eligibility for recruitment as Ex-Servicemen must be determined as on the last date of application submission, dismissing the appeal of serving personnel appointed without requisite qualifications.
Pradeep Mehra v. Harijivan J. Jethwa
The Supreme Court held that executing courts cannot reopen final orders allowing execution under Section 47 CPC, emphasizing the principle of res judicata and directing expeditious completion of execution proceedings.
RAJESWARI v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging mobile number reallocation, holding that existing regulatory and platform measures adequately protect subscriber privacy.
L & T Finance Limited v. Diamond Projects Limited; Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd v. Signy Technologies Pvt Ltd; Vedaang Builders LLP v. Ashwinkumar Liladhar Shah; Spenta Vintage Pvt Ltd v. Evershine No.II CHS Ltd; Manish Sheth v. Ketan Sheth
The court held that despite an arbitration agreement being unstamped and thus unenforceable under the Stamp Act, interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act can still be granted pending payment of stamp duty.
Michael Onyeka Jude v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.
The Bombay High Court upheld the order permitting retesting of seized narcotic samples during investigation under the N.D.P.S. Act, holding that such retesting is allowed within prescribed guidelines and does not violate the accused's rights.
Santosh Motiram Pisat v. Smt. Sumitra Mohanlal Lain & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that Rent Courts have jurisdiction to entertain composite suits for recovery of possession and injunctions related to tenanted premises, overruling the appellate court's order directing separate forums.
Baburao Shivputra Erandole & Ors v. Kumar Adwait Nikhil Erandole & Ors
The High Court held that a coparcener cannot obtain a blanket injunction restraining alienation of joint family property during a partition suit, modifying the trial court's order to a limited injunction protecting specific land.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Manakchand Laxman Baheti
The High Court upheld the disciplinary action against a Chartered Accountant for professional misconduct in issuing unverified certificates, reprimanding him to maintain professional integrity and public confidence.
Monica Sagar Kate & Anr v. The Joint Registrar & Ors
The High Court held that summary recovery proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act cannot decide disputed factual issues like genuineness of 'No Dues Certificates' and Release Deeds, which must be adjudicated by the Cooperative Court under Section 91.
Monica Sagar Kate & Anr v. The Joint Registrar & Ors
The High Court held that summary recovery proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act are inappropriate for disputed loan repayment claims involving 'No Dues Certificates' and Release Deeds, which must be adjudicated by the Cooperative Court under Section 91.
Mission Save Constitution v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court upheld police revocation of permission for a public event on grounds of apprehended communal tension, affirming limited judicial review over executive decisions restricting fundamental rights in interest of public order.
INSP GD GHAYWAT MANGESH GOVIND v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondents agreed to consider the petitioner’s case independently of the challenged transfer guideline clause.
b437c9f3ebeb9e5ccf257794be9ea67ee9e641f76c5d11fc07c87fd7149f6811
The court upheld the criminal conviction and sentence of the petitioner, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the trial and appellate courts correctly applied the law.
MORINGO ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MAREESOFT INFOTECH OPC PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes arising under software agreements containing an arbitration clause.
Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati v. Union of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a petitioner who commenced construction within five years under a 2010 NOC is entitled to revalidation without reassessment under the 2015 Rules, quashing refusal letters and directing reconsideration accordingly.
M/s. Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Private Limited v. Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property of India
The Bombay High Court held that the Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property lacks jurisdiction to issue directions prohibiting transfer or construction on properties not yet vested in the Custodian under the Enemy Property Act, 1968, and set aside such communications and consequential orders.
Appasaheb Pandurang Yadav & Ors. v. Appasaheb Virupaksh Tandale & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s refusal to condone delay in filing tenancy appeal, affirming that termination of tenancy under section 25(1) is valid without three separate notices and emphasizing finality over meritless prolonged litigation.
Union of India v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that Ministry of Defence circulars requiring NOC do not apply retrospectively to constructions permitted before 2011 and that such circulars lack statutory force to restrict property rights without legislative backing, dismissing the petition to quash construction permissions near a Defence Establishment.