Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dinesh Mittal & Ors. v. M/S Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court condoned delayed claims, approved a settlement for disputed land compensation, fixed reserve price for liquidation sale of TIDCO properties, and directed renewal of statutory licenses to expedite resolution for allottees and creditors.
Irshad Ahmad v. Sukhe Singh @ Mahesh Master
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal in a cheque bounce case, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Amazon Wholesale India Private Limited v. Customs Authority of Advance Ruling, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Amazon Echo devices are primarily communication devices classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 8517, overturning the AAR's classification under speaker and monitor headings.
Vijay Gupta & Ors. v. Vinay Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a limited stay on Non-Bailable Warrants issued by NCDRC against petitioner directors pending statutory appeals before the Supreme Court, emphasizing timely prosecution of appeals and deferring deposit conditions to the apex court.
M/S TRENDS v. Leelamma Thomas and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the worker's application for interim wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, holding that the claim of financial hardship was not credible and the employer entity had closed prior to the award.
Geeta Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for death in a railway accident, holding that the claimant failed to prove the deceased was a bonafide passenger who died in an untoward incident.
In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into Union Territories through Presidential Orders and Parliamentary legislation under Article 356.
Amanat Ali v. State of Karnataka and others
The Supreme Court allowed consolidation of multiple FIRs registered within Madhya Pradesh for trial before a single court under Article 142, while rejecting transfer of FIRs from other states.
Sunita v. Mukesh Kumar
The High Court allowed withdrawal of a first appeal against an executing court's order and clarified that liberty to approach a superior court cannot be granted by a lower court.
Yokohama India Pvt. Ltd v. Varun Aggarwal Proprietor of Wheels Lover Stoppage
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a commercial suit to be heard along with an earlier suit involving the same parties and overlapping issues to promote judicial economy and avoid conflicting decisions.
JOLLY GEORGE & ANR. v. GEORGE ELIAS AND ASSOCIATES
The Supreme Court held that an Acknowledgement Certificate under the Kerala MSME Act overrides the requirement of Panchayat license for establishing a Hot Mix Plant, allowing the petitioner to operate without further Panchayat permission.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Lauretta Shashi Mogale
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal by adjusting salary components but enhanced the claimants' compensation including future prospects and consortium, rejecting intoxication and contributory negligence claims.
Mother Dairy Fruits & Vegetables Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Maa Baisnavi Enterprises and Others
The Delhi High Court restrained Defendants from using the 'Mother Dairy' mark outside West Bengal, directing them to adopt 'Banglar Dairy' and remove the former mark from packaging, disposing of the suit accordingly.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in re-filing income tax appeals by the revenue but dismissed them on merits, holding no substantial question of law arises as the Supreme Court has already affirmed the legal position on profit attribution to the assessee.
Neeraj Arya v. Rakesh Arya & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a relinquishment deed executed in favor of one co-owner excluding others is a gift deed requiring proper stamp duty, and impounded the deed for adjudication of stamp duty and penalty.
Ralson (India) Limited v. Kunal Taluja and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that service of trademark opposition documents by email is valid if an email ID is provided, set aside the dismissal of opposition as abandoned, and allowed the appellant to file evidence.
Procter and Gamble Company v. Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside a patent refusal order passed without allowing the applicant to respond to a statutory notice and after an unreasonable delay, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice and statutory timelines.
Shri Deepanshu Goel v. M/S Vijay Trading Co. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendants’ leave to defend application in a suit for recovery based on a dishonoured cheque with admitted signatures, holding that the defence of forgery was mala fide and the suit was within limitation.
PUMA SE v. GAJARI ONLINE SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed Puma SE's petition to cancel a confusingly similar trademark registered by Gajari Online Services Pvt Ltd, affirming protection for well-known marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Sh. Ram Niwas Yadav v. M/S Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte arbitral award and the rejection order under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the application was within extended limitation and the court had jurisdiction despite the arbitrator's office location.