Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 v. UT Starcom Inc.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's deduction of liquidated damages paid in AY 2008-09, upholding the findings of fact that the damages were duly suffered and adjusted.
Usha Bansal v. M/s Genesis Finance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Settlement Agreement under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing petitions alleging fraud and coercion for lack of credible evidence and emphasizing the binding nature of mediated settlements.
K Suresh v. Agnibh Mudi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a driver can be held liable for accidents caused by a co-passenger's negligent door opening while the vehicle is stationary, remanding the claim for assessment of contributory negligence and compensation.
Ram Chandra Omer and Another v. State Bank of India
The High Court held that under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, the pre-deposit for appeal must be based on the amount claimed by the secured creditor, and disputed liability issues cannot reduce this mandatory deposit.
S K Kapoor v. Surinder Sood & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant conditional interim protection from eviction by staying execution of the eviction order subject to payment of use and occupation charges and compliance with specified undertakings.
Chandan Bhatia v. Satish Singhal
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte order against the tenant on condition of payment of arrears and future charges, directing compliance with procedural timelines and encouraging mediation.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Oxygen Business Park Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of incriminating material found during search, assessments cannot be reopened under Section 153A based on post-search material, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Bimal Papers Pvt Ltd v. Jayco Sales
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement in a commercial suit must comply with mandatory procedural requirements and directed the trial court to adjudicate on objections before condoning delay.
Madhuri Goel v. Chandra Prakash & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a pending application under Section 151 CPC for restoration of possession must be decided before directing amendment of the plaint for possession relief, keeping the Trial Court's order in abeyance pending such adjudication.
Vinod Rajoria v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs expedited acquisition and interim compensation for land unlawfully occupied by DDA, rejects alternate land allotment claim, and exempts procedural requirements under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Jagmohan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Probate to the petitioner for the last Will of Late Ms. Kulbir Kaur, holding the Will validly executed and uncontested by heirs.
Yuvi Aspiring Pvt. Ltd. v. Manish Sharma and Anr
The Delhi High Court decreed the civil suit in terms of a lawful tripartite settlement for transfer of a registered trademark, closing the dispute under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Mithu Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus writ petition for a missing person, directing police to continue investigation and submit periodic status reports without judicial interference.
Sanju Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declined to issue a writ of habeas corpus for a missing child under active police investigation, directing continued investigation and periodic reporting instead.
Susheela v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition concerning a missing minor by directing ongoing police investigation with periodic status reports, refusing direct judicial intervention.
HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH AND CO. KG v. SANDEEP ARORA TRADING AS ARRAS THE BOSS
The Delhi High Court expunged a copyright registration for an artistic work substantially imitating the well-known 'BOSS' trademark, holding the petitioner a 'person aggrieved' entitled to rectification under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Ralson India Limited v. Sham Lal M/S Ramesh Lal and Sons and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that service of trade mark opposition documents by email is valid if an email address is provided as the address for service, and dismissed the appeal against the opposition's dismissal as abandoned for non-filing of evidence.
Yajur Commodities Ltd. v. Suresh Asrani
The Delhi High Court held that time spent pursuing a suit bona fide and diligently in a wrong court can be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, allowing the plaintiff's suit to proceed within limitation despite initial filing in Bombay High Court.
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust & Anr. v. M/S Guru Nanak International & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded damages against a defendant manufacturing counterfeit Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger products, relying on an unchallenged local commissioner’s report as evidence.
M/S RALSON (INDIA) LIMITED v. SHRI SURINDER SINGLA
The Delhi High Court held that service of trademark opposition documents by email to an address provided in Form TM-M is valid service, and failure to file evidence thereafter justifies dismissal of opposition as abandoned.