Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
JOLLY GEORGE & ANR. v. GEORGE ELIAS AND ASSOCIATES
The Supreme Court held that an Acknowledgement Certificate under the Kerala MSME Act overrides the requirement of Panchayat license for establishing a Hot Mix Plant, allowing the petitioner to operate without further Panchayat permission.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Lauretta Shashi Mogale
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal by adjusting salary components but enhanced the claimants' compensation including future prospects and consortium, rejecting intoxication and contributory negligence claims.
Mother Dairy Fruits & Vegetables Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Maa Baisnavi Enterprises and Others
The Delhi High Court restrained Defendants from using the 'Mother Dairy' mark outside West Bengal, directing them to adopt 'Banglar Dairy' and remove the former mark from packaging, disposing of the suit accordingly.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in re-filing income tax appeals by the revenue but dismissed them on merits, holding no substantial question of law arises as the Supreme Court has already affirmed the legal position on profit attribution to the assessee.
Neeraj Arya v. Rakesh Arya & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a relinquishment deed executed in favor of one co-owner excluding others is a gift deed requiring proper stamp duty, and impounded the deed for adjudication of stamp duty and penalty.
Ralson (India) Limited v. Kunal Taluja and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that service of trademark opposition documents by email is valid if an email ID is provided, set aside the dismissal of opposition as abandoned, and allowed the appellant to file evidence.
Procter and Gamble Company v. Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside a patent refusal order passed without allowing the applicant to respond to a statutory notice and after an unreasonable delay, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice and statutory timelines.
Shri Deepanshu Goel v. M/S Vijay Trading Co. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendants’ leave to defend application in a suit for recovery based on a dishonoured cheque with admitted signatures, holding that the defence of forgery was mala fide and the suit was within limitation.
PUMA SE v. GAJARI ONLINE SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed Puma SE's petition to cancel a confusingly similar trademark registered by Gajari Online Services Pvt Ltd, affirming protection for well-known marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Sh. Ram Niwas Yadav v. M/S Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte arbitral award and the rejection order under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the application was within extended limitation and the court had jurisdiction despite the arbitrator's office location.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 v. UT Starcom Inc.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's deduction of liquidated damages paid in AY 2008-09, upholding the findings of fact that the damages were duly suffered and adjusted.
Usha Bansal v. M/s Genesis Finance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Settlement Agreement under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing petitions alleging fraud and coercion for lack of credible evidence and emphasizing the binding nature of mediated settlements.
K Suresh v. Agnibh Mudi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a driver can be held liable for accidents caused by a co-passenger's negligent door opening while the vehicle is stationary, remanding the claim for assessment of contributory negligence and compensation.
Ram Chandra Omer and Another v. State Bank of India
The High Court held that under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, the pre-deposit for appeal must be based on the amount claimed by the secured creditor, and disputed liability issues cannot reduce this mandatory deposit.
S K Kapoor v. Surinder Sood & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant conditional interim protection from eviction by staying execution of the eviction order subject to payment of use and occupation charges and compliance with specified undertakings.
Chandan Bhatia v. Satish Singhal
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte order against the tenant on condition of payment of arrears and future charges, directing compliance with procedural timelines and encouraging mediation.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Oxygen Business Park Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of incriminating material found during search, assessments cannot be reopened under Section 153A based on post-search material, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Bimal Papers Pvt Ltd v. Jayco Sales
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement in a commercial suit must comply with mandatory procedural requirements and directed the trial court to adjudicate on objections before condoning delay.
Madhuri Goel v. Chandra Prakash & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a pending application under Section 151 CPC for restoration of possession must be decided before directing amendment of the plaint for possession relief, keeping the Trial Court's order in abeyance pending such adjudication.
Vinod Rajoria v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs expedited acquisition and interim compensation for land unlawfully occupied by DDA, rejects alternate land allotment claim, and exempts procedural requirements under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.