Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Saroj Gagneja v. Assistant Commissioner of State Goods and Services Tax Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and procedural fairness, setting aside the retrospective cancellation order and directing cancellation from the date of the petitioner’s application.
P.R. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-02 v. B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the power to extend time under the proviso to Section 142(2C) of the Income Tax Act is vested exclusively in the Assessing Officer and cannot be delegated to any superior authority, dismissing the revenue's appeals.
Deepak Saluja v. SPG Consumer Product Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a commercial suit under Article 227, subject to conditions ensuring expeditious trial and costs to the respondent.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Trojan Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted a proper enquiry into share valuation, rendering the revisionary order unsustainable.
Komal Bansal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking continuation of contractual employment and payment of dues, holding that contractual workers have no vested right to extension and mandamus lies only in cases of arbitrariness or mala fide exercise of discretion.
Union Public Service Commission v. Vikash Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing UPSC to confirm the selection of a candidate with Dysgraphia without requiring a 40% disability certificate for scribe assistance, applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Vikash Kumar v. UPSC.
Pushpa Mishra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that a passenger with a valid railway ticket for the date of travel is entitled to compensation under strict liability for death caused by an untoward railway incident, setting aside the Railway Claims Tribunal's dismissal.
Deepak Aggarwal v. A.R. Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit belated photographs as evidence in an eviction proceeding, emphasizing the need for timely and relevant evidence to prevent trial delay.
Satya Prakash v. Ramveer
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of 43-day delay in filing written statement subject to costs and procedural compliance, setting aside the trial court’s dismissal order.
Glen Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Kunal Singh
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's 'GLEE' trademark registrations for being deceptively similar to the petitioner's 'GLEN' mark, violating Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and causing consumer confusion.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Macleods Pharmaceutical Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions restraining disparaging advertisements against a pharmaceutical product, accepted the defendant's undertaking to discontinue such conduct, and awarded litigation costs to the plaintiff.
Chhanga Mal Gupta v. Pradeep Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the tenant's revision petition by recording an amicable settlement allowing stay of eviction subject to payment of use and occupation charges and vacating the premises by a stipulated date.
M/S Raxa Security Services Limited v. Sagar Kumar Mandal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award holding the termination of a worker without compliance with statutory safeguards illegal, emphasizing the necessity of intention to abandon and principles of natural justice before termination.
Subhash Nagpal v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking relief identical to a previously dismissed petition, emphasizing judicial economy and that the petitioner is not a proposed accused in the SEBI complaint.
Pawan Duggal v. India Sothebys International Realty
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's order refusing to delete the petitioner from the suit array but clarified that the petitioner's liability will be decided at final hearing uninfluenced by interlocutory observations.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Puneet Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of rash and negligent driving causing death, rejected contributory negligence for lack of license and helmet, modified compensation for tax and non-pecuniary heads, and upheld interest awarded under Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
M/S AAIRA BATTERIES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for failure to provide particulars and opportunity of hearing, directing restoration of registration subject to compliance with law.
Veena Nagar v. Kireshwati & Ors.
The court held that the plaintiff, as dominus litis, cannot be compelled to implead the petitioner who failed to establish any prima facie right or interest in the suit property, and dismissed the petition seeking impleadment.
Govind Vashisht v. Tejpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of an eviction petition to the correct territorial jurisdiction court under Section 24 CPC, permitting continuation of proceedings from the existing stage.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Satish Chandra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's award of 9% interest on compensation, affirming the Tribunal's discretionary power under Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act to determine a just and fair interest rate beyond RBI notified rates.