Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil PK v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for prolonged unauthorized absence, affirming that personal hardships do not excuse breach of discipline under the BSF Act.
New Balance Athletics Inc. v. Jitender Kumar, Trading as J. K. Enterprises & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared New Balance's shaded 'N' logo a well-known mark and granted permanent injunction against defendants using deceptively similar marks, ordering withdrawal of infringing trademarks and payment of costs.
Kavita @ Meena v. Vijay
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that the appellant's illicit relationship and conduct constituted mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Bineet Singh Bisht v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld termination of an ITBP employee for deliberate suppression of a pending criminal case in verification forms, emphasizing the employer’s right to rely on truthful disclosure for trustworthiness.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. Hersh Washesher Chadha
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal under Section 260A, upholding the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 69A for unexplained money where the non-resident assessee satisfactorily explained the credit entries and was not obliged to maintain books of account in India.
MS Indraprastha Ice and Cold Storage Pvt Ltd v. MS Cardiff Associates Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for possession, holding that the petitioner failed to prove dispossession within six months prior to suit, rendering the suit barred by limitation and not maintainable.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Amit Rana
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the petitioners to refer a disputed recruitment exam question to an expert committee and comply with its opinion within a specified timeframe.
Jubliant Foodworks Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting unilateral amendment of license fees and affirmed limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Pankaj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed an independent specialist examination to determine the petitioner’s medical fitness regarding vision, disposing of the writ petition without deciding on the merits.
M/S R. K. Metal Industries v. Commissioner of GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without recorded reasons and covering periods with filed returns is arbitrary and unlawful, allowing cancellation only from the date of firm closure.
Pawanjit Singh Bawa v. Union of India
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to summon official witnesses to prove documents already admitted without objection, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Article 227.
Samrat Singh Rawat v. Poonam Rawat
The Delhi High Court extended the appellant father's visitation rights with his minor children, emphasizing child welfare and recommending that Children Rooms remain open on Sundays and second Saturdays to facilitate visitation.
Industria Chimica Adriatica ICA v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to decide the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for AY 2017-18 within twelve weeks by a reasoned order.
State v. Saurabh
The High Court set aside the trial court's discharge order in a rape case for ignoring key evidence and remanded for framing of charge after proper consideration of all material.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Sonali G Badhe; Directorate of Enforcement v. Ajay Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that while the Directorate of Enforcement is exempt from RTI disclosure under Section 24 except in cases of corruption or human rights violations, information related to sexual harassment allegations must be disclosed, but recruitment rules and service record information not involving human rights violations remain exempt.
U.P JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD v. C.G POWER & INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that delay in filing a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act without proof of due diligence and good faith in prosecuting prior proceedings before courts lacking jurisdiction.
Bliss Habitat Pvt Ltd and Ors. v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing and re-filing petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that initial filings were not non-est and procedural defects were curable under the 2018 Rules.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Delhi v. Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order excluding certain comparables in transfer pricing analysis and dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging ALP adjustments and disallowances under the Income Tax Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Praveen Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award awarding assured monthly returns and interest on a withdrawn claim, holding the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction and clarifying the limited scope of remission under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration Act.
Joseph Taheny v. Tektronix Inc
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award transferring the domain name "tek.in" to Tektronix Inc., holding that the award was valid, the domain was registered in bad faith, and procedural objections were waived.