Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Narendra Pandey v. Jagtar Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a post-trial amendment application seeking specific performance, holding that the amendment introduced a time-barred new cause of action and the petitioner failed to show due diligence as required under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Tannu v. The State Govt. of NCT Delhi and Anr.
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused involved in a loan fraud case due to her absconding status and necessity of custodial interrogation for investigation.
Bhura v. Union of India
The High Court allowed the appeal and awarded statutory compensation to the claimant for death caused by accidental falling from a running train, holding the deceased was a bonafide passenger and the incident an untoward incident under the Railways Act.
Mukti Dutta v. Vijay Bhushan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaintiff has an unconditional right to withdraw a suit, but in partition suits involving multiple parties with identical interests, defendants may be transposed as plaintiffs to continue adjudication of substantial questions.
M/S Mittal Footcare v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST refund claim for re-adjudication after finding that the petitioner’s documents were not considered due to a technical glitch and that the appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal without allowing the petitioner to cure defects.
ASES SECURITY PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to process the petitioner's VAT refund along with interest within two weeks, following the setting aside of the demand by the appellate tribunal and a technical error in filing.
SIGHT SOUND ELECTRONICS (I) PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to refund Rs 15,86,956/- along with interest to the petitioner as per the refund order, despite minor name discrepancies.
Sharda Metal Works through its Proprietor Dilip Kumar v. The Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of specific grounds and procedural fairness, emphasizing the need for objective satisfaction and opportunity of hearing under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act.
NTPC LTD v. K N INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, upholding the tribunal’s finding of no fraud and affirming minimal judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Seema Gautam v. Shiv Shanker & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to terminate the arbitrator's mandate and appointed a new independent arbitrator under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a partnership dispute.
Sanjeev Lakra v. Bhim Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a defendant's application to amend the written statement after issues were framed, holding that a change of defence that sets up an entirely new case is impermissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Union of India v. Poonam & Ors.
The High Court set aside the Railway Claims Tribunal's compensation award, holding that the deceased was not a bonafide passenger and died due to being struck by a train while crossing tracks, thus no compensation was payable under the Railways Act.
Five Star Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Orchid Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award partly granting payment to the contractor, holding that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding a sum for a non-existent claim unsupported by evidence.
M S M P State Co Op Oilseed Growers Federation Ltd v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the modification of an arbitral award based on mutual consent, holding that a party cannot withdraw such consent after delay and that the modification stands upheld.
Uday Narayan Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a missing person after noting exhaustive police efforts and directed continued investigation with periodic reporting.
Anjari Khatoon v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed transfer of investigation of missing daughters and grandchild to the Anti Human Trafficking Cell with periodic reporting, ensuring effective police action under Habeas Corpus jurisdiction.
Rajeev Kumar & Anr. v. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of a preliminary issue on the interpretation of a registered Will regarding ownership rights, allowing the appeal to proceed on admitted facts without further evidence.
Amar Singh Bhatia & Anr. v. Sir Ganga Ram Hospital & Ors.
The Court held that the Authorisation Committee must adhere to prescribed timelines for scheduling interviews and deciding organ transplant applications to prevent undue delays that defeat the objectives of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994.
Nand Kishor Meena v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Food Corporation of India to reconsider the petitioner's premature retirement in accordance with departmental circulars and judicial directions, allowing the writ petition for reconsideration but not automatic reinstatement.
Mehmoodul Hasan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider the petitioner’s representation challenging forest land classification and maintain status quo on demolition pending adjudication.