ASES SECURITY PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR

Delhi High Court · 04 Jan 2024 · 2024:DHC:61-DB
Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja
W.P.(C) 101/2024
2024:DHC:61-DB
tax petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to process the petitioner's VAT refund along with interest within two weeks, following the setting aside of the demand by the appellate tribunal and a technical error in filing.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 101/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 04.01.2024
W.P.(C) 101/2024 & CM. APPLS. 437/2024
ASES SECURITY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR....Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ramanand Roy, Mr. Mayank Kouts and Mr. Shiva Narang, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to refund an amount of Rs.8,35,184/- allegedly due to the petitioner alongwith interest thereon.

2. Petitioner filed a return for the fourth quarter of 2012-13 on 26.04.2013 and claimed a refund of Rs.8,35,184/- under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act.

3. An assessment order was passed by the Value Added Tax Officer creating a demand of Rs.2,86,784/- and therefrom an W.P.(C) 101/2024 adjustment was made. Petitioner objected to the said assessment order, leading to an order being passed by Objection Hearing Authority. The order passed by the Objection Hearing Authority was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal on 06.10.2021. Thereafter, petitioner tried to file Form DVAT-21, however, on account of a technical error, the same was not accepted. As per the petitioner, the refund for the tax period already paid has already been filed by the respondents and no demand appears in the portal, however, refund has not yet been processed for the said quarter.

4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondents, who submits that on account of an error, the same could not be processed and assures that the refund shall be processed within a period of two weeks from today. The statement is taken on record.

5. In view of the above, petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to process the refund within a period of two weeks. Respondents shall also grant to the petitioner admissible interest in accordance with law.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JANUARY 04, 2024/NA RAVINDER DUDEJA, J