Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Santosh Bhasin v. Umari Malhotra
The Delhi High Court held that the barsati room and terrace not mentioned in the Will devolve by intestacy equally to the parties, and the partition suit was not barred by limitation.
Truth Fashion v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act
The Delhi High Court directed the GST authorities to expedite adjudication of the petitioner's refund claim after ensuring issuance of deficiency memo and opportunity of personal hearing.
M/S EEN EEN SALES CORPORATION v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, BADLI DIVISON, NORTH DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a vague and unreasoned GST registration cancellation order, holding that retrospective cancellation requires objective satisfaction and proper opportunity to the taxpayer.
M/S SAFFRON ART PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to process and pay the petitioner's refund claim for 2014-15 along with statutory interest within two weeks.
Zafar Abbas v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under UAPA, holding that prima facie evidence of his involvement with Lashkar-e-Taiba and related terrorist activities justified continued custody.
Dr. Balbir Singh Bhandari v. The State of Uttarakhand
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's cancellation of a pay scale order and allowed recovery of amounts paid to Ayurvedic Medical Officers, emphasizing the need for Cabinet approval and consistency with Finance Department orders.
Alagammal and Ors. v. Ganesan and Anr.
The Supreme Court held that failure to pay the balance consideration within the stipulated time and absence of readiness and willingness bars suit for specific performance, especially where a prior sale deed exists, and allowed the appeal restoring the trial court's dismissal.
Raju and Another v. State of Uttarakhand
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 307 IPC due to contradictions and absence of key witnesses, restoring the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellant.
HDFC BANK LIMITED v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
The Supreme Court held that the complaint contained sufficient averments to hold a director vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the High Court’s quashment of proceedings against her.
Surjit Singh Arora v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority
The Bombay High Court upheld the termination of a developer’s appointment for inordinate delay and breaches under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, emphasizing the authority’s power to ensure timely slum rehabilitation.
Arvind Sethi v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court discharged the accused bank official from criminal charges due to lack of prima facie evidence of active involvement despite procedural lapses in loan sanctioning.
The Pashmina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Latif Mohamed Hassambhoy & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal, holding that restrictive covenants limiting construction height are enforceable only if they secure beneficial enjoyment of adjoining property, and dismissed the suit for failure to prove such harm.
General Motors Employees Union v. General Motors India Private Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's Award permitting General Motors India to close its Talegaon plant, holding that timelines under Section 25-O are directory and substantial accumulated losses justify closure.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. R. Bhuvaneswari & Anr.
The High Court held that sanction for prosecution once refused by the competent authority on given materials cannot be reconsidered without fresh evidence, and accordingly upheld discharge of accused for lack of valid sanction.
Dabur India Limited v. MI Lifestyle Marketing Global Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' proposed new toothpaste packaging does not prima facie infringe the plaintiff's registered composite trademarks and permitted its use pending suit disposal.
Mohit Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking production of the petitioner’s wife and minor child as they were present in Court and the wife refused to return, directing parties to approach the Family Court.
Sushma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed continued police investigation with monthly reports and transfer to Anti-Human Trafficking Unit in a petition seeking production of a missing minor girl.
Arif Khan v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against a man accused of kidnapping and sexual offences, holding that the consensual marriage and disputed minority of the woman warranted quashing in the interest of justice.
Sushil Kumar Rai v. Monika Chauhan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a foreign custody order, holding that such orders are presumed valid and writ jurisdiction cannot substitute family court remedies.
Kinadhan Chakma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the detention of a foreign national held for deportation, holding that such detention under the Foreigners Act and Foreigners Order is lawful and does not violate constitutional rights.