Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt Ltd v. Nutrilite Agro Products Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the 45-day time limit for filing replication under its Original Side Rules is mandatory and cannot be extended, but delay in filing affidavit of admission/denial may be condoned with costs.
Rooma Bhutani v. Sanjeev Sapra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed applications for impleadment in a partition suit due to lack of documentary proof of ownership and directed sale of the property by auction with proceeds distributed as per the Preliminary Decree.
Sukhbir Singh v. Consolidation Officer & Another
The Delhi High Court set aside the Financial Commissioner’s order for failing to afford the petitioner a hearing before altering land consolidation records, emphasizing the mandatory application of natural justice in such proceedings.
M/S OPUSKART ENTERPRISES & ORS. v. KAUSHAL KISHORE TYAGI
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate partnership disputes involving alleged misappropriation, holding that the arbitration clause is valid despite referencing an outdated statute and that claims involving related company business are arbitrable under the Group of Companies doctrine.
Mohit Kumar Sharma v. Technology Development Board
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a corrigendum modifying fee terms for a panel advocate and upheld deletion of certain parties due to absence of mala fide.
Mahesh Talreja v. Radha Savitri Sindhi Dharamshala Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a suit involving possession of a property to be heard along with a partition suit over the same property to avoid conflicting decisions.
Union of India v. Deepak Goyal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a CAT order that was based on an earlier order already quashed by the Court, allowing the writ petition filed by the Union of India.
M/S Steamgen and Control System & Anr. v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that unsubstantiated mental depression and financial hardship do not constitute sufficient cause under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
O.P. Sahni v. National Textile Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking pay parity benefits after a 16-year delay, holding that laches and acquiescence bar relief to a petitioner not party to the original award.
Sgt Bajinder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a movement order consequent to a reversion order pending before the Armed Forces Tribunal, holding that the High Court will not interfere without a stay from the Tribunal.
Jagjit Singh Bhatia v. Roop Rani Mehra
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord lawfully established bonafide requirement and the tenant failed to raise triable issues warranting leave to defend.
Rajendra Singh Shekhawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under the MACP Scheme, financial upgradation is limited to the immediate next higher grade pay and not to the grade pay of the next promotional post, dismissing the petitioners' claim for higher grade pay.
SOMA ENTERPRISE LTD. v. ENVIRO GEOSYNTHETICS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the mandatory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, applying the Supreme Court’s COVID-19 limitation exclusion directions.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. v. TUSHAR FULARE
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Tata Sons for trademark and copyright infringement against a defendant using deceptively similar trade dress and marks, awarding injunctions and nominal damages.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Subhas Chandra Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of a charge memorandum issued after an unexplained 12-year delay, emphasizing that such delay causes prejudice and vitiates disciplinary proceedings.
Vijyant Agarwal v. Netaji Subhas University of Technology
The Delhi High Court directed the disciplinary authority of NSUT to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's seniority complaint within eight weeks, issuing a writ of Mandamus under Article 226.
Jaspreet Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to the execution proceedings enforcing interim maintenance, holding that proper service and due process were followed and no natural justice violation occurred.
Mohd. Abdullah v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court found no police lapse in a missing child case, mandated technological tracing measures, and issued contempt proceedings against WCD officials for non-compliance with security guard orders.
M/S SHIV ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the tax department to decide the petitioner's GST cancellation application expeditiously within six weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without prejudging the merits.
Manish Sharma v. State of NCT (Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of an adult woman who voluntarily chose to stay with her parents, affirming her right to decide her residence.