Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hitesh Saini v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Medical Board's disqualification of the petitioner for being overweight, holding that absent mala fide or extraneous reasons, the Board's findings are final and no fresh medical examination is warranted.
Twenty Five South Realty Ltd v. DLF Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment disposing Section 9 petitions without hearing the appellants, directing a rehearing and allowing the majority shareholder to retain shares pending disposal.
INSP/GD Ankit Kumar Tyagi v. Director General ITBP
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's statutory pre-confirmation petition within three months, ensuring timely disposal of the matter.
Sunil Kumar v. The Principal District Judge and Sessions Judge HQ
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who completed qualifying service for financial upgradation cannot be denied retrospective benefits merely due to resignation, directing implementation of upgradation with consequential relief.
Lovely Pal and Anr. v. Honey Chandel Honi Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that delay in filing the written statement in a partition suit cannot be condoned due to laxity and unsubstantiated claims of settlement or medical issues.
Karuna Nidhan v. Rajiv Gauba & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents had complied with the Court's order on NFSG grant and that contempt jurisdiction does not extend to issuing supplementary directions.
Union of India v. Mithlesh Tyagi
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting pensionary benefits for ad-hoc service rendered beyond prescribed age limits, holding such service does not qualify as pensionable under CCS Pension Rules without regularization.
Thakar Dass Bhatia v. Suresh Kumar Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a partner's personal property mortgaged as security for a partnership firm's loan remains subject to the charge until the loan is repaid, and the court will not direct its release absent consent of borrower and mortgagor.
Dr. Yogesh Yadav v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to decide expeditiously on the petitioner’s claims for higher HRA and increments under the Post Graduation Policy, while reserving further legal remedies.
Amit Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Amit Aggarwal in a money laundering case involving forged foreign remittance documents, holding that the stringent conditions under Section 45 of PMLA apply and the petitioner failed to satisfy them.
Union of India & Ors. v. Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT order relying on a prior tribunal order and held that dismissal of the SLP leaving the question of law open does not entitle reopening of the matter.
Rajesh Sharma v. Government Boys Senior Secondary School No. 2
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over title and possession of land between private parties cannot be adjudicated by writ petition and must be resolved through civil suit.
Akash v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a POCSO case who was not identified by the victim and implicated solely on co-accused statements, emphasizing the balance between accused’s rights and trial integrity.
Vipul Jain v. State Through Govt of (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail application in a forgery case involving a fabricated arbitration order, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation for effective investigation.
DSSSB v. Tanisha Ansari and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing appointment of the respondent as OBC candidate, holding that certificates submitted within an extended deadline granted by the authority cannot be rejected on timing grounds.
Janki Prasad v. Sanjeev Khirwar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot question the correctness of compliance with its order and discharged the contempt petition after finding the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had complied by conducting the directed inquiry.
Suman Kumar Verma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to join the civil post of Assistant Professor within one week of discharge from the Air Force, dismissing the writ petition as infructuous since discharge was imminent.
Varinder Kaur v. Jasvinder Kaur Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents complied with the original order on 6th CPC arrears payment and that claims beyond the explicit order must be pursued through appropriate legal remedies.
Rajeev Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the Indian Air Force granted discharge to the petitioner, enabling him to join the Deputy Collector post in Jharkhand.
Neeraj Bhatt v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted four weeks' parole to a prisoner convicted under POCSO on medical grounds, holding that serious health issues constitute special circumstances under prison rules permitting parole.