Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S MASS COMPUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award granting reinstatement with full back wages to a workman illegally terminated without due process, refusing to interfere under writ jurisdiction absent perversity or no evidence.
Rambir Rathi@ Ramveer Singh v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a police officer accused of rape and threats, holding that serious allegations and pending cross-examination of the prosecutrix preclude bail at this stage.
Rajni Gupta v. Principal Commissioner State GST and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act must be based on objective criteria with proper notice, and set aside cancellation with effect prior to the petitioner's application date.
M/S GOLD PLUS GLASS INDUSTRY LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the implementation of the Policy Relaxation Committee’s directions favoring the petitioner for issuance of the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate and ordered expeditious processing of the case.
State of Haryana v. Mohd. Yunus & Ors.
The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction of Mohd. Jamil due to unreliable eyewitness testimony but upheld his conviction for causing hurt, and dismissed the State's appeal against Mohd. Yunus's acquittal for murder.
Birla Corporation Limited v. Bhanwar Singh and Others
The Supreme Court restricted blasting within five kilometers of Chittorgarh Fort to protect the heritage monument, mandated expert studies for blasting beyond that radius, and balanced mineral exploitation with preservation.
S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court directed enhanced implementation, monitoring, and awareness measures for the Motor Vehicles Act's hit and run compensation Scheme, including police duties to inform victims and consideration of compensation enhancement and limitation extension.
Sanjay Kundu v. Nishant Sharma
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s ex parte order transferring the DGP without hearing him, directing the formation of an independent SIT to investigate allegations of misuse of office.
Veena Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mumbai City-IX
The Bombay High Court held that a technical defect in a penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act cannot vitiate penalty proceedings at the appellate stage without the assessee proving prejudice, distinguishing the Ventura Textile Ltd. decision.
Mumbai- 400 012 v. U/s. 84 of the Multi State Co-0perative Societies Act
The Bombay High Court held that the MSMED Act Notification dated 29 May 2015 is a non-binding guideline and non-compliance thereof does not invalidate NPA classification or SARFAESI recovery proceedings against MSMEs.
Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital v. Ashoka Shetty
The Bombay High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that an employee performing primarily manual and operational duties with limited supervisory oversight qualifies as a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing the employer's writ petition challenging this status.
Vitthal Rama Pawar v. Deputy Collector (Acquisition) Raigad-Alibag
The Bombay High Court held that land acquisition Awards passed without applying a valid multiplier factor notification under the 2013 Act and beyond the statutory 12-month period are invalid, quashing the Awards and directing fresh proceedings.
Satish Buba Shetty v. Inspector General of Registration and Collector of Stamps
The Bombay High Court allowed refund of stamp duty despite delayed cancellation of sale agreement, applying equitable principles to relieve the petitioner from strict statutory time limits due to impossibility of performance caused by developer's default and prolonged legal proceedings.
Nazim Abdul Rehman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant due to material discrepancies in prosecution evidence and held that the benefit of doubt must be given where guilt is not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Rachana Kamlesh Shahani v. Sunshine Financial Services & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties.
Hyundai Construction Equipment India Pvt Ltd v. M/s. Saumya Mining Limited
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding that exclusive jurisdiction lies with the Kolkata High Court where the earliest application under the Arbitration Act was filed, notwithstanding the arbitration venue clause specifying Pune.
Ajmera Enterprises v. Dilipkumar Rameshchandra Patel
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on ground of non-user, holding that a suit filed by some co-owners of an Association of Persons is maintainable and absence of electricity supply for over six months establishes non-user under Maharashtra Rent Control Act.
Hare Krishna Pathak v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting the class of admission from Class-I to Class-III and directed immediate admission of the petitioner’s ward in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Narela.
Hari Om Metals v. The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective satisfaction and proper reasoning, modifying the cancellation to take effect prospectively.
PANKAJ PLASTIC v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction, proper Show Cause Notice with particulars, and an opportunity of hearing, setting aside the impugned retrospective cancellation order for lack of these safeguards.