Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat v. Ms. Uma Rani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing B.Ed. (Special Education) degree holders to be eligible for general teaching posts where the advertisement did not exclude them.
Union of India & Ors. v. Warrant Officer A. K. Singh Retd. 15211
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for CAD and DM-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service absent other causes.
Jasbir Kaur Deceased & Ors. v. Sh Ram Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, holding that tenants must produce substantive evidence to raise a triable issue against a landlord's bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
ARORA MEDI LINES PVT LTD v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a tender clause requiring demonstration kits for educational materials, holding that exceptions in the Procurement Manual temper the GeM portal's prohibition on sample evaluation during bid processes.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals challenging the ITAT's acceptance of comparables for benchmarking royalty payments under transfer pricing for AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17, affirming the CUP method and comparability criteria.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Remfry & Sagar
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing license fee payments for use of goodwill as legitimate business expenditure, rejecting Revenue's contention that such payments violated Bar Council Rules and were disallowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
National Bal Bhawan & Anr. v. Khazan Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a Review Petition and held that the plea of Doctrine of Necessity cannot be entertained at the appellate stage when not raised earlier, emphasizing judicial discipline.
Union of India v. MWO(HFL) Shardendu Chatterjee
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II as covered by earlier judgments.
Rajendra Prasad v. V. Srinivas
The Delhi High Court discharged the contempt notice and disposed of the contempt petition after the respondent filed a compliance affidavit.
Union of India & Ors. v. 1433514 Ex Narain Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition filed by Union of India as not pressed after the petitioners acknowledged the respondent was injured in the 1965 war.
Loktantrik Adhyapak Manch v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the Returning Officer's order rescinding GSTA elections, directing elections to proceed on the existing membership list with provisions for voluntary withdrawal and refund, balancing constitutional compliance and practical realities.
Abhishek Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a sexual offence case involving a minor, holding that serious allegations and the victim's minor status preclude bail at this stage.
Danish alias PK v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's bail plea in a serious firearm assault case, emphasizing the gravity of the offences and the nascent stage of investigation as grounds to deny bail.
M/S Indraprastha Gas Limited v. Ambrish Kumar
Delhi High Court set aside Labour Court award reinstating a workman, holding he was employed by a contractor and not the government undertaking petitioner, emphasizing the claimant's failure to prove employer-employee relationship with petitioner.
Suman & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
ARCH EN DESIGN v. M/S MUKESH AND ASSOCIATES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of M/s Mukesh & Associates as PMC for AIIMS Madurai, holding that absence of incriminating evidence in the FIR and adherence to JICA guidelines rendered the appointment valid.
Rakesh v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 323 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing rehabilitation and mitigating factors in sentencing.
Nirmal Bhatla & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld probate of a Will executed by an elderly, infirm testator, holding that testamentary capacity and due execution were proved and objections based on incapacity and suspicious circumstances failed.
State of Jharkhand v. The Indian Builders Jamshedpur
The Supreme Court referred to a larger bench the question whether prohibitory contractual claim clauses bind arbitral tribunals, clarifying that the Bharat Drilling decision is not a binding precedent on this issue.
Bolla Malathi v. B. Sugunaand
The Supreme Court held that a nomination for General Provident Fund does not automatically become invalid upon marriage without formal cancellation, but where a nomination condition renders it void, the fund must be equally distributed among eligible family members.