Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Panaesha Education Society v. Sh. Varun Goenka & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon parties' mutual consent, reserving rights including counterclaims, to resolve disputes under a lease agreement.
M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD v. MORESTEP PATHLABS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
GLOCAL THINKERS PVT LTD v. INSTRUMENTATION AUTOMATION SURVEILLANCE COMMUNICATION SECTOR SKILL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd v. Bhoruka Classic Finance Private Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause in the principal Loan Agreement governs disputes under both the Loan Agreement and the Deed of Guarantee forming a single composite transaction, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bhosale Akash Gajanan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging disqualification from CISF recruitment due to defective colour vision, upholding medical board findings conducted per prescribed standards.
Union of India & Ors. v. Dr. Anil Kumar Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a disciplinary penalty imposed on a government officer for procurement irregularities, holding that the penalty was based on no evidence and a non-speaking order ignoring inquiry findings.
Sharmila v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal’s order and Show Cause Notice, holding that prolonged unauthorized absence may be treated as deemed resignation under CCS Leave Rules, and departmental procedures must be followed before rejoining.
Union of India & Anr. v. Kavya Roy Choudhury; 672596 EX HFL Ratan Lal Mahato
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, emphasizing the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and rejecting nonspeaking medical board reasons.
Gurvinder Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Sangeeta @ Sanyogita v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.
Naresh Sukhdev Sindhe v. Seema Baweja & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a civil suit dismissed for default where the plaintiff showed sufficient cause due to simultaneous penal proceedings and bona fide conduct, and condoned delay in filing restoration application.
Rajender Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and abuse of process, emphasizing that only persons directly affected may invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Divisional Railway Manager v. Kanchan Tiwari
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act accrues only until the date of deposit, but interest from the date of accident can be awarded under discretionary powers to do complete justice.
Kshitij Raghav & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Mohd. Asif Ansari and Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
State v. Dhanraj @ Manish & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused under Section 397 IPC due to lack of identification and material omissions, dismissing the State's appeal.
Mr. Amaan Khan v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for an accused in a sexual assault and blackmail case under POCSO, affirming that a minor's consent is legally irrelevant and custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation.
Telecom Watchdog v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed in a disposed writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and initiation of contempt proceedings, holding such application not maintainable and emphasizing the doctrine of functus officio and proper remedies for challenging FIRs.
Subhajit Dutta v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's writ petition and appeal challenging judicial and administrative orders, rejecting his claim of special constitutional status and holding that statutory remedies must be pursued instead of writ petitions for such grievances.
Sudarshan Rani v. Ankur Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed maintenance of status quo over disputed property pending trial where ownership was contested on the basis of disputed Wills.