Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SHEIKH NOORUL HASSAN v. NAHAKPAM INDRAJIT SINGH
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretionary grant of leave to file replication in an election petition, clarifying that replication is permissible under the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 and CPC procedure, provided no new cause of action or material facts are introduced beyond the original petition.
Vijay Laxman Bhawe Legal Heirs v. P & S Nirman Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that a stranger to a suit cannot file an application for condonation of delay for restoration, quashing the orders allowing such restoration and directing the trial court to decide the pending application by the legal heirs on merits.
Union of India v. Santosh Kumar Tiwari
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of compulsory retirement as a disciplinary punishment under the CRPF Rules, affirming the punishment imposed on the respondent and setting aside the High Court's order.
Hindustan Export & Import Corporation Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of deduction under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act where the appellant failed to prove furnishing of commercial knowledge or technical services beyond sharing newspaper cuttings, affirming the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction to verify compliance despite prior approval of the agreement.
Prasad Dattajirao Patil v. M/s. Chaudhary Construction Company & Ors
The Bombay High Court set aside the Trial Court's order allowing amendment to implead the petitioner personally as defendant, holding that such amendment was barred by limitation and changed the suit's nature impermissibly.
Chiplun Sand Mining & Trading Corporation v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the State cannot unilaterally apply a revised sand mining policy to contracts executed under an earlier policy, affirming the principle that contractual terms cannot be altered without mutual consent.
Naresh Govind Vaze v. High Court of Bombay; Government of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld procedural Rules regulating parties appearing in person, holding they are reasonable, valid, and do not violate constitutional rights.
Abhijit S. Shingote v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing repatriation of a minor child to the USA with her father, emphasizing the child's best interest over parental claims and recognizing the limited enforceability of foreign custody orders in India.
Anoop Kumar Aggarwal v. Prem Kumar Soin
The High Court allowed transfer petitions and directed Rent Control Tribunal cases to be heard by another Principal District and Sessions Judge following recusal by the original judge.
Principal Commissioner of Customs v. M/S. Linear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court held that for determining the monetary threshold for filing appeals under CBIC circulars, only the duty involved is decisive, and dismissed the appeal as the duty was below the prescribed limit.
M/S Wellness Marketing Exi Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.
Chemrow India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.
M/S POINT FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to decide the petitioner's refund claims under Section 42 of the DVAT Act within four weeks, allowing further legal remedies if dissatisfied.
Mrishi Marcndey India Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Department of Trade and Taxes
The Delhi High Court set aside an order dismissing a GST show cause notice for non-response, directing the petitioner be given an opportunity to respond and the matter be re-adjudicated in accordance with law.
Amita Gandoak v. Harkirat Singh Sodhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition, holding that the earlier consent decree is binding and cannot be challenged by an independent suit, and that the plaintiff's claim is barred by limitation, estoppel, and lack of cause of action.
M/S NEWAGE SCAFFOLDINGS PVT. LTD. v. M/S PARAMOUNT INFRAVENTURE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to a bona fide dispute over debt liability, directing the petitioner to pursue civil remedies with liberty to condone delay.
Giridhari Pal v. Vice Chancellor University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing retrospective promotion of a Technical Assistant to Senior Technical Assistant with seniority from 2016, rejecting delay and procedural objections but denying retrospective financial benefits.
State v. Roshan
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a child sexual assault case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of credible evidence proving kidnapping or assault beyond reasonable doubt.
Nakul Kumar Jain & Ors. v. The Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Luv Chaudhary v. Shruti Agarwal
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals and a contempt petition by directing detailed custody and visitation arrangements prioritizing the child's welfare and ensuring parental access to school information.