Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gymnastics Federation of India v. Padmaja Garikipati and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory stay on election notice, holding that any variation must be sought before the same court and will be decided according to law.
Ali Qureshi and Anr. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in minor offence cases.
Amit Choudhry v. Kawandeep Singh Sampuran
The Delhi High Court held that cross-examination under Section 138 NI Act can be conducted via video conferencing and the respondent cannot withdraw prior consent for virtual examination without valid reasons.
Sanjay Babu Rinku v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC based on subsequent marriage and settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash serious offences in appropriate cases.
Mulakh Raj Dua v. The State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to consider the petitioner's refund application for stamp duty paid on a voided auction sale, holding that the six-month limitation under Section 54 of the Indian Stamp Act is not absolute and must be reckoned from the date of knowledge of non-use.
Suresh Bhati and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, directing adherence to visitation rights.
Sneh Lata & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under non-heinous IPC sections upon amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC with conditions for social responsibility.
Saraf Paper Mills Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court dissolved M/s. Saraf Paper Mills Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator and permitting transfer of surplus funds after completion of liquidation.
Atamjit Singh & Ors. v. Sports Fit World Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Companies Act, 2013 provisions mandating such transfer.
Atul Raheja and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to land classification and compensation under the National Highways Act must be addressed before an arbitrator, and acquisition notifications issued prior to highway notification are valid.
Kanav Gupta & Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Ravinder Kumar & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/324/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in a minor offence dispute.
Krishan Pal @ Bobby v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused charged with murder under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence, risk of witness tampering, and directed expeditious trial progress.
Vijay Maheshwari v. Splendor Buildwell Private Limited & Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that unilateral appointment clauses are invalid under the amended Act and allowing the petitioner’s arbitration petition in a real estate dispute.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court scheduled further hearings on multiple trademark infringement suits involving unauthorized domain name registrations and emphasized the obligation of domain name registrars to comply with court orders for blocking infringing domains.
Ashok Kumar Makhija v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and order for AY 2017-18 due to lack of requisite approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, affirming that reopening after three years requires prior sanction from specified authorities.
Mr. Rajesh Markanda, Mr. Keshri Kumar, Mr. Rohan Markanda, Ms. Aviral Setia v. M/S DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD
Delhi High Court held that the Court can extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal even after its expiry under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and granted a 12-month extension to the tribunal's mandate.
G4S Secure Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Matrix Cellular (International) Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from limitation computation, allowing the petitioner to invoke arbitration and appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kanika Singhal & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 2020 amendment to the Master Plan of Delhi's EWS housing clause, dismissing petitioners' challenge to pricing and procedural compliance under Section 11A of the Delhi Development Act.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Sujatha and Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by deducting personal allowances from the deceased's income and lowered the interest rate to 7.5% per annum, clarifying principles for loss of dependency calculation.