Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

State of M.P. & Anr. v. M.P. Transport Workers Fedn.

29 Jan 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Madhya Pradesh Labour Laws (Amendment) Act, 2002, holding that transferring trial jurisdiction from Labour Courts back to regular criminal courts does not violate the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Labour Courts Criminal Courts Madhya Pradesh Labour Laws Amendment 2002 Article 21

Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another

29 Jan 2020 · M. R. Shah; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is a discretionary remedy without inherent time limits, operative upon arrest, and courts may impose conditions or limit its duration based on case facts, balancing liberty and investigation rights.

criminal other Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. duration of bail judicial discretion

Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another

29 Jan 2020 · M. R. Shah; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is a discretionary remedy without inherent time limits, which continues until curtailed or cancelled by the court, balancing individual liberty and police investigation rights.

criminal other Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. judicial discretion duration of bail

Mohandas and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others

29 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; K. M. Joseph · 2020 INSC 105
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that reservation of land under a Development Plan does not lapse under Section 127 if a declaration under Section 126(4) is made within ten years, and upheld the continuation of reservation under a revised Development Plan, dismissing the appellants' challenge.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 127 Section 126(4) Development Plan

Mohandas and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others

29 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that land reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act does not lapse if a declaration under Section 126(4) is published within ten years, and a revised Development Plan continues the reservation, dismissing the appellants' challenge.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 127 Section 126(4) Development Plan

Shripal Bhati v. State of U.P.

29 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of deputation appointment and absorption of an employee in NOIDA under the 1981 Service Regulations and held that appellants lacking promotion eligibility had no locus standi to challenge the same.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deputation appointment absorption NOIDA Service Regulations, 1981 U.P. Industrial Development Act, 1976

Shripal Bhati & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

29 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of deputation appointment and absorption of an employee under NOIDA Service Regulations and statutory absorption rules, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit and locus standi of the appellants.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deputation appointment absorption NOIDA Service Regulations, 1981 U.P. Absorption Rules, 1984

Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Others

29 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 103

The Supreme Court upheld the President's rejection of the mercy petition of a death-row convict, affirming limited judicial review of mercy petitions and rejecting claims of non-application of mind, solitary confinement, and procedural lapses.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution of India death sentence commutation judicial review

Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Others

29 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the President's rejection of a death-row convict's mercy petition, affirming limited judicial review and procedural compliance in mercy petition consideration.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution of India death sentence commutation judicial review

The Branch Manager, Indigo Airlines, Kolkata & Anr. v. Kalpana Rani Debbarma & Ors.

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that failure of passengers to report at the boarding gate within stipulated time constitutes 'Gate No Show' and does not amount to deficiency in service by the airline, dismissing the consumer complaint for compensation.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant deficiency in service consumer protection boarding pass gate no show

The Branch Manager, Indigo Airlines, Kolkata & Anr. v. Kalpana Rani Debbarma & Ors.

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that failure to report at the boarding gate on time constitutes 'Gate No Show' absolving the airline of deficiency in service liability, and dismissed the consumer complaint for lack of proof.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant deficiency in service consumer protection boarding pass gate no show

Dr. Vijayakumaran C.P.V. v. Central University of Kerala

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 93

The Supreme Court held that a probationary termination based on a formal inquiry report finding misconduct is stigmatic and requires a regular departmental inquiry, setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination simplicitor stigmatic termination probationary termination sexual harassment inquiry

Dr. Vijayakumaran C.P.V. v. Central University of Kerala

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a termination order based on an inquiry report finding serious misconduct is stigmatic and illegal without a regular departmental inquiry, setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination of probationer stigmatic order sexual harassment inquiry Internal Complaints Committee

Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the Election Tribunal's order directing recount of votes due to irregularities, declared the appellant duly elected under Section 140 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, and set aside the respondent's election.

election_law appeal_allowed Significant election petition recount of votes Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 Section 140

Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad

28 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Election Tribunal's order for recount of votes due to counting irregularities and declared the appellant duly elected under Section 140 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, setting aside the respondent's election.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election petition recount of votes irregularities in counting Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006

Kirpal Singh & Ors. v. Kamla Devi & Ors.

28 Jan 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha · 2020 INSC 97

The Supreme Court held that pending surplus land determination proceedings under the 1953 Act must be completed under that Act, excluding applicability of the 1972 Act's provisions on permissible area selection, and dismissed the appeal of subsequent purchasers challenging the surplus declaration.

property appeal_dismissed Significant surplus land Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 Section 33(2)(ii)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. R. Chandramouleeswaran and Others

28 Jan 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjiv Khanna; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that tenants not in actual physical possession of leased land and buildings, having sub-let or licensed the premises, are not entitled to protections under the Madras City Tenants’ Protection Act, 1921, including the right to compel sale of leasehold land under Section 9.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Madras City Tenants’ Protection Act, 1921 Section 9 tenant rights actual physical possession

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. M/s. J.K. Cement Works

28 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that damage caused by heavy rainfall resulting in accumulation of water qualifies as 'flood' and 'inundation' under an insurance policy, dismissing the insurer's appeal against claim repudiation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant flood inundation insurance policy interpretation pluvial flood

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. M/s. J.K. Cement Works

28 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld that damage caused by heavy rainfall leading to accumulation of water qualifies as 'flood and inundation' under an insurance policy, dismissing the insurer's appeal against the NCDRC award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance policy flood inundation heavy rainfall

Sujit Tiwari v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

28 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant in a narcotics smuggling case, holding that bail under the NDPS Act may be granted where the accused's involvement is not clearly established, despite the statutory bar.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act default bail Section 167 CrPC